今日签到，+2天延保
社区APP签到可获双倍延保！
扫描二维码立即下载
联想笔记本经典系列
总帖数： 4338 / 今日发帖： 46 / 关注数： 13
晒单】移动工作站--THINKPAD P50 开箱晒图+使用感受
在线时间0 小时
因处理数据，需要一台强大的本本，早早的就瞄准了搭载号称是至强处理器的XEON E3的THINKPAD P50这款移动工作站，前段时间在联想官网（美网）下了订单。15.6寸屏幕、512G的固态硬盘、NVDIA M2000M 4GB、16GB DDR4 2133SODIMM的内存。在这里不得
IMG_2878.JPG (1.55 MB, 下载次数: 1)
官网选择的配置
21:56 上传
不吐槽下国内的官网，在配置选择上没有国外那么自由，可以完全按自己的需要和想法挑选配置。
IMG_2888.JPG (1.33 MB, 下载次数: 0)
UPRS的邮单
21:58 上传
IMG_2879.JPG (1.7 MB, 下载次数: 1)
22:00 上传
IMG_2880.JPG (1.33 MB, 下载次数: 2)
22:00 上传
IMG_2881.JPG (1.23 MB, 下载次数: 0)
22:00 上传
IMG_2882.JPG (1.39 MB, 下载次数: 0)
22:00 上传
IMG_2883.JPG (1.4 MB, 下载次数: 1)
22:00 上传
IMG_2884.JPG (1.35 MB, 下载次数: 0)
22:00 上传
IMG_2885.JPG (1.34 MB, 下载次数: 1)
22:00 上传
IMG_2886.JPG (1.5 MB, 下载次数: 1)
22:00 上传
IMG_2887.JPG (1.11 MB, 下载次数: 1)
22:00 上传
截止目前感受：
1、拿到手时还是蛮兴奋的，心里想着跑程序肯定会特别流畅了，但是实际上在使用METLAB的时候还是觉得有点慢；
2、开机速度是相当的快，由于没有装360，没有具体的开机时间数据，只能说快的让人难以置信；
3、键盘的触感很好，很舒服，由于是15.6寸的机型，在右侧还配备了数字小键盘，很方便；
4、不太习惯的是充电接口在后面，感觉不是很好，习惯于在侧边，后面各种常用的接口，USB VGA HDMI等，还有一个雷电接口，背面还有扩展坞接口；
5、电池续航：电池是方砖型的，续航能力在6-7小时，还不错；
6、16G的内存觉得还是不够，这几天又买了两个16G的内存条；
7、让人非常不爽的是：使用刚过一个月，电源适配器居然坏掉了，去客服注册了国际联保，半个月换了一个国产的适配器，这个让我对THINKPAD的质量产生了非常不好的印象，若果后期还有这种问题频发的话，以后可能再也不会买联想 THINKPAD的机子了。
联想开学嗨购季！
在线时间120 小时
恭喜楼主！
在线时间302 小时
社区目前暂时不支持海外机型的延保哦
在线时间0 小时
社区目前暂时不支持海外机型的延保哦
区别对待...
在线时间55 小时
感谢楼主分享！您当前的位置 ：&&&&&&
Xeon E3配Quadro独显 ThinkPad P50评测
　编辑：谈义
　　作为品牌积淀最深厚的PC品牌之一，ThinkPad这两年有过不少创新产品，比如超轻薄的ThinkPad X1Carbon和W系列移动工作站。今天的主角ThinkPadP50是ThinkPad旗下全新的移动工作站产品，其采用了Intel首款移动端E3处理器和NVIDIA最新的QuadroM2000M专业独显，下面带来P50的全国首发评测。
　　 外观：碳纤维黑色机身淡化Lenovo品牌
　　全黑色碳纤维机身
　　在外观上，ThinkPadP50与大多数ThinkPad产品并没有太明显的不同，全黑色碳纤维机身，机身顶盖的左上角和右下角分别有“ThinkPad”和“Lenovo”的品牌标识，不过这一代的“Lenovo”标识出奇的小，看得出来联想在有意淡化“Lenovo”品牌。
　　ThinkPad P50没有采用比较前卫的Intel RealSense实感摄像头，屏幕边框的宽度与前作也没有太大区别。
　　与所有ThinkPad高端产品相同，ThinkPad P50的屏幕最高可翻转至180度。转轴左侧还设有一枚硬盘状态指示灯。
　　 四个USB 3.0+一个雷电3接口
　　ThinkPad P50的机身右侧配有两个USB 3.0接口，一个mini DP接口和一个耳机/麦克风二合一接口；机身左侧则配有一个SD读卡器，一个扩展卡插槽和一个智能卡读卡器。
　　ThinkPad第一次在机身的后侧也设置了I\O接口，P50的机身后侧配有两个USB 3.0接口，一个RJ45网络接口，一个雷电3接口，一个HDMI接口，一个电源接口。
　　ThinkPad P50的机身底部还配有一个扩展坞插座。P50创下了ThinkPad历史上两个第一次：第一次在机身后侧设置接口；第一次在工作站中舍弃VGA显示接口。
　　 旅行重量高达3.3公斤
　　ThinkPad P50的机身体积和重量与前代相差不大，裸机重量为2.562千克，旅行重量为3.252千克。与主打轻薄的ThinkPad W550S相比稍重了一点点。
　　下一页
　　体验：4K分辨率\传统TP触控板样式回归
　　 最高可选4K分辨率IPS雾面屏幕
　　ThinkPad P50有FHD分辨率和4K分辨率两种屏幕规格可选，均采用IPS雾面屏幕，并且不支持触控。
　　作为一台合格的工作站，屏幕素质自然不会太差。ThinkPad P50在色彩还原、颜色过渡等方面都有着出色的表现，不过屏幕亮度算不上一流水平。
　　 小红点键盘和复古的触控板设计
　　ThinkPad P50采用了配有数字小键盘的标准小红点键盘，配有两级亮度调节的白色键盘背光灯。它延续了ThinkPad一贯的高品质使用感受，键程略深，反馈感受软中带硬，打字体验非常舒适。
　　ThinkPad P50的触控板设计可谓相当复古，整个触控板区域没有物理按键，触控板上下方各设有三枚实体按键。这个是ThinkPad三年前的触控板解决方案，很多小黑粉丝也非常怀念这个设计。
　　 色彩校准仪&按压式指纹识别
　　触控板左右两侧分别配有色彩校准仪和指纹识别装置，指纹识别模块采用了更先进的按压式，识别速度更快，用起来也更加方便。
　　上一页
　　下一页
　　性能：Xeon E3配Quadro专业独显
　　 Xeon E3处理器配Quadro专业独显
　　ThinkPad P50 一共有三款处理器可选，分别是i7-6700HQ、i7-6820HQ和E3-1505M V5；8GB DDR4和16GBDDR4两种内存可选；2GB显存的Quadro M1000M和4GB显存的Quadro M2000M两种规格的独立显卡可选。
　　我们拿到的是配备了E3-1505M V5、16GB内存、512GB SSD、4GB显存Quadro M2000M独立显卡的顶配版。
　　CPU规格介绍和性能测试
　　E3-1505M V5是Intel的首款移动端服务器处理器，其采用了Intel最新的Skylake架构，四核心八线程设计，14nm工艺制程，主频2.8GHz，最高睿频3.5GHz，智能高速缓存为8MB，TDP值为45W。
　　XeonE3处理器在DIY玩家心中是一款具有传奇色彩的CPU，在桌面平台中，E3能以i5的价格提供i7的性能，这一点是它受欢迎的最主要原因。而对于移动工作站来说，E3和i7的性能并没有相差太多，价格上E3也更贵一些，所以大家不要被Xeon品牌蒙蔽了双眼。
　　E3-1505M V5相比i7-6820HQ的最大不同是E3支持ECC内存，ECC内存使电脑能够更安全稳定地运行，根据我们拿到的测试机来看，它配备的内存只是普通的DDR4内存，并不支持ECC技术，并且主板禁用了ECC功能，我们也没能在BIOS设置中找到开启的选项。因此把它当做是一款普通的高性能CPU看待即可。
　　使用CineBenchR15软件进行测试，其最终单线程成绩为133，多线程成绩为686，表现比游戏本中的i7-6700HQ更好一些。考虑到其它参数几乎完全相同，只有主频和睿频的差异，所以E3-1505M V5是ThinkPad P50中性能最好的CPU。GPU规格介绍和性能测试
　　ThinkPad P50拥有两颗GPU芯片，分别是集成在处理器中的P530核芯显卡和Quadro M2000M专业独立显卡。以往的Intel Xeon E3处理器是不集成核芯显卡的，在移动端Intel保留了核芯显卡配置。
　　ThinkPad　P50采用了NVIDIA全新发布的QuadroM2000M专业级显卡。其采用了NVIDIA最新的Maxwell架构设计，拥有640个CUDA单元，核心频率1098MHz，最高频率1137MHz，最高显存频率5000MHz，显存位宽128Bit，显存带宽80GB/S，显存容量4G GDDR5，TDP仅为55W。
　　使用3DMark CloudGate软件进行测试，其最终成绩为22901，与NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M相差不多。虽然性能依然有限，不过这已经是我们近两年来拿到过的性能最好的Quadro独显！
　　Quadro的优势在于NVIDIA会针对专业应用进行驱动和硬件方面的定制优化，有着更低的故障率和更长的使用寿命。所以虽然性能表现比较主流，但在实际应用中会有着更长的生命周期和更稳定的使用体验。
　　硬盘测试
　　ThinkPadP50使用了来自三星的512GB容量M.2固态硬盘，使用ASSSD软件进行测试，其最终读取成绩为492.05MB/S，写入成绩为447.68MB/S。ThinkPad在如此顶级的产品中没有使用速度更快的PCI-E固态硬盘有些遗憾。
　　上一页
　　下一页
　　细节：升级配件难找\续航、散热出色
　　 升级存储空间需要专用转接设备
　　ThinkPad P50的硬件升级比以往产品稍微复杂一些，除了机身底部的快速升级面板之外，ThinkPad还在键盘下方预留了一些扩展空间。
　　ThinkPad P50机身底部的快速升级面板下配有两个DDR4内存插槽，两个M.2固态硬盘插槽和一个2.5英寸SATA硬盘位(仅支持7mm硬盘)，电池仓位置还隐藏了一个SIM卡卡槽。
　　拆开键盘后我们可以进一步对它进行升级，ThinkPad P50在这里有两个DDR4内存插槽，一个3G网卡插槽和无线网卡插槽。
　　P50在这一部分可谓槽点满满，两个M.2固态硬盘插槽需要配合专用的硬盘托架才可以使用，而这个配件并没有随机赠送；2.5英寸硬盘位也需要一根转接线才可以与主板连接，而联想香港、美国官网都没有关于两款转接配件的相关信息；顶配版并没有自带3G网卡，用户需要自行安装才可以使用3G功能。
　　 热辐射面积较大，但温度不高
　　ThinkPadP50采用了双风扇散热设计，在运行AIDA64一段时间后使用热成像仪进行测试，其键盘面的最高温度为46.1度，整个键盘都有热量分布，其中键盘中心区域热量最多，不过由于温度不高，所以并不会对用户带来太大影响；机身底部的最高温度则为57.8度，热量主要集中在机身上方扩展坞插槽附近。
　　 1080P视频播放长达10小时
　　ThinkPadP50配备了一块容量为90Wh的可拆卸电池，将屏幕亮度调至60%，音量调至16%，连接WiFi，使用内置播放器连续播放一段1080P视频3个小时共耗电30%，也就是说一个小时耗电10%，据此推测，ThinkPadP50的续航时间高达10个小时！即使高强度使用也会有至少7小时左右的续航时间。这样的表现对于一台15英寸4K笔记本来说已经非常出色。
　　 依然是一台值得买的移动工作站
　　移动工作站本来就不是面向普通消费者的产品，所以无论是过去的W系列，还是现在的P系列都不会成为主流大众消费者的选择。
　　回到ThinkPad P50身上，如果你准备买这款产品，我们并不推荐购入E3版，ThinkPad P50并没有将E3应有的优势(ECC内存)发挥出来，比i7版高出的0.1GHz主频和睿频并没有给它带来根本性的性能提升。
　　如果你在犹豫要不要买这款产品，最好先问一下自己能不能搞到升级存储空间的两种转换设备，它们太特殊了，市面上实在很难找到。
　　最后，在无视ThinkPad P50的这两点硬伤之后，它也能够称得上是一台值得买的移动工作站，目前我们的售价为11399元起，购机就送固态硬盘和系统恢复U盘，感兴趣的朋友可以下单购买了。
　　上一页
新闻纠错：022-
我来说两句
?&??????????????
热点新闻排行榜
| 违法和不良信息举报电话：022- | 举报邮箱：jubao@ |
(C) 2000-.cn, Tianjin ENORTH NETNEWS Co.,LTD.All rights
本网站由天津北方网版权所有联想 ThinkPad P50s-20FKS00400 笔记本电脑简短评测 - Notebookcheck
联想 ThinkPad P50s-20FKS00400 笔记本电脑简短评测
Andreas Osthoff ( Yuchen Wang), 03/28/2016
过时？ 联想的最新ThinkPad P50s是ThinkPad W550s的后续产品。尽管尺寸紧凑，这台移动工作站的用户仍然可以得到足够的性能。不过相比前代产品由于处理器性能有所下降，它有一个同样来自联想的强力竞争对手。
Test device courtesy of
2.5&GHz Graphics adapter - 2048 MB, Core: 1124&MHz, Memory: 1001&MHz, DDR3, 361.91, OptimusMemory8192&MB& , DDR3L-1600, 单通道，两个内存槽，一个已占用，最大支持32GBDisplay15.5 inch 16:9,
213 PPI, WX16T028J00, LEN40B5, IPS, glossy: noMainboardIntel Skylake-U Premium PCHStorageSamsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP, 256&GB& , 215 GB freeSoundcardIntel Skylake-U/Y PCH - High Definition AudioConnections3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, 1 Docking Station Port, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米耳机插口, Card Reader: 四合一 (MMC, SD, SDHC, SDXC), 1 SmartCard, 1 Fingerprint ReaderNetworkingIntel Ethernet Connection I219-V (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2Sizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 22.45 x 380.6 x 258.2Battery67 Wh Lithium-Ion, removeable, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 12 hCameraWebcam: 高清摄像头 (720p)Additional featuresSpeakers: 立体声, 2x 1瓦, Dolby Audio系统, Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: yes, 电源适配器，快速开始说明，质保信息, 36 Months WarrantyWeight2.219 kg, Power Supply: 323 g
Price1400 Euro&
>> >> >>&>>&>>&>> >>&>> >> >> >>&>>&>>
&&&&&&MSI WS60-6QJE316H11 &&&&&&Lenovo ThinkPad P50 &&&&&&Lenovo ThinkPad P50s-20FKS00400 &&&&&&HP ZBook 15u G3 &&&&&&Dell Precision 5510
Front: no ports
Right: 2x USB 3.0, Mini-DisplayPort, fan exhaust, slot for a Kensington lock
Left: power, USB 3.0, HDMI, 3.5 mm audio, SD-card reader, Gigabit Ethernet, SmartCard reader
Rear: no ports
298cd/m²296cd/m²310cd/m²277cd/m²319cd/m²278cd/m²263cd/m²290cd/m²276cd/m²
Distribution of brightnessX-Rite i1Pro 2Maximum: 319&cd/m² Average: 289.7&cd/m²Brightness Distribution:&82 %Center on Battery: 320&cd/m²Contrast: 1029:1 (Black: 0.31&cd/m²)&DE Color 4.8 |
- &O&DE Greyscale 5.7 |
- &O87.4% sRGB (Argyll) 56.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll) Gamma: 2.07
WX16T028J00, LEN40B5, IPSSHP143E, 7PHPT_LQ156D1, IGZO LEDCMN15C3, TN LEDMSI WS60-6QJE316H11SDC424B, IPSLP156WF6-SPK1, IPSVVX16T028J00, IPS LED Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *3856.4 -48%45.6 -20%34 11%46 -21% Response Time Black / White *28.834 -18%34.4 -19%24 17%26 10% PWM Frequency219198.4 -9%1316 501%Brightness290361 24%284 -2%208 -28%236 -19%323 11%Brightness Distribution8287 6%89 9%77 -6%78 -5%81 -1%Black Level *0.310.4 -29%0.849 -174%0.26 16%0.34 -10%0.54 -74%Contrast1029978 -5%351 -66%912 -11%774 -25%667 -35%Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *4.84.85 -1%8.68 -81%4.42 8%2.35 51%3.45 28%Greyscale DeltaE2000 *5.74.01 30%9.3 -63%4.43 22%3.33 42%2.98 48%Gamma2.07 116%2.18 110%2.27 106%2.23 108%2.38 101%2.06 117%CCT6260 104%7340 89%10585 61%6133 106%6917 94%6338 103%Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)56.996 69%50.99 -10%52.5 -8%37 -35%56 -2%Color Space (Percent of sRGB)87.4100 14%80.42 -8%82.9 -5%58 -34%86.3 -1%* ... smaller is better
Display Response TimesDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.&&&&&&& Response Time Black to White28.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined&# ms rise&# ms fallThe screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. & 66&% of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (27.9 ms).&&&&&&& Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined&# ms rise&# ms fallThe screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 250 (maximum) ms. & 33&% of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (43.3 ms).
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM detected 219 Hz90&% brightness settingThe display backlight flickers at 219&Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90&%
and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.The frequency of 219&Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.In comparison: 58&% of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 495 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 10420) Hz was measured.
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5
158 Points &100% +22%
Intel Core i7-6600U
143 Points &91% +11%
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5
142 Points &90% +10%
Intel Core i7-6600U
141 Points &89% +9%
Intel Core i7-6500U
129 Points &82%
Intel Core i7-5500U
124 Points &78% -4%
Intel Core i7-6820HQ
117 Points &74% -9%
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5
732 Points &100% +138%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5
674 Points &92% +120%
Intel Core i7-6820HQ
592 Points &81% +93%
Intel Core i7-6600U
347 Points &47% +13%
Intel Core i7-6600U
330 Points &45% +7%
Intel Core i7-6500U
307 Points &42%
Intel Core i7-5500U
260 Points &36% -15%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5
1.78 Points &100% +19%
Intel Core i7-6600U
1.63 Points &92% +9%
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5
1.6 Points &90% +7%
Intel Core i7-6600U
1.57 Points &88% +5%
Intel Core i7-6500U
1.49 Points &84%
Intel Core i7-5500U
1.42 Points &80% -5%
Intel Core i7-6820HQ
1.32 Points &74% -11%
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5
7.93 Points &100% +130%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5
7.42 Points &94% +115%
Intel Core i7-6820HQ
6.48 Points &82% +88%
Intel Core i7-6600U
3.83 Points &48% +11%
Intel Core i7-6600U
3.67 Points &46% +6%
Intel Core i7-6500U
3.45 Points &44%
Intel Core i7-5500U
2.85 Points &36% -17%
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit6241 PointsCinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit14039 PointsCinebench R10 Shading 64Bit5472 PointsCinebench R10 Shading 32Bit5476 Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit10447 Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit4886 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit39.77 fpsCinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit3.45 PointsCinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit1.49 PointsCinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit99.6 %Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit48.45 fpsCinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit307 PointsCinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit129 PointsHelp&&&...&6300U, HD Graphics 520305&6300U, HD Graphics 520306&6500U, HD Graphics 520307Lenovo ThinkPad P50s-20FKS00400
&6500U, Quadro M500M307&4210M, HD Graphics 4600307&6600U, Quadro M500M308&6500U, HD Graphics 520308&&&...
&6820HK, GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)875
PCMark Vantage Result15876&pointsPCMark 7 Score4992&pointsPCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v22790&pointsPCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v23744&pointsHelp&&&...&6500U, HD Graphics 5204977&4800MQ, Radeon HD 8790M4983&6200U, HD Graphics 5204989Lenovo ThinkPad P50s-20FKS00400
&6500U, Quadro M500M4992&5200U, GeForce 940M4995&6820HQ, Quadro M3000M5003&4710HQ, Radeon R9 M265X5010&&&...
&6820HK, GeForce GTX 980 SLI (Laptop)8047
5100 Points &100% +36%
4900 Points &96% +31%
4677 Points &92% +25%
4442 Points &87% +19%
4323 Points &85% +15%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11
4045 Points &79% +8%
3744 Points &73%
4213 Points &100% +51%
3974 Points &94% +42%
3941 Points &94% +41%
3542 Points &84% +27%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11
3134 Points &74% +12%
3061 Points &73% +10%
2790 Points &66%
5493 Points &100% +10%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11
5340 Points &97% +7%
5317 Points &97% +7%
5190 Points &94% +4%
4992 Points &91%
4892 Points &89% -2%
4474 Points &81% -10%
Legend& Intel Core i7-6500U, NVIDIA Quadro M500M, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP& Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5, NVIDIA Quadro M1000M, SK hynix SC920 512 GB& Intel Core i7-6600U, AMD FirePro W4190M, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e&MSI WS60-6QJE316H11 Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5, NVIDIA Quadro M2000M, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5128GP& Intel Core i7-6820HQ, NVIDIA Quadro M2000M, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP& Intel Core i7-5500U, NVIDIA Quadro K620M, Samsung SSD PM851 512 GB MZ7TE512HMHP& Intel Core i7-6600U, Intel HD Graphics 520, Samsung SSD SM951a 512GB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVKV512)
Sequential Read:
475.5 MB/sSequential Write:
304.7 MB/s512K Read:
379.3 MB/s512K Write:
303.4 MB/s4K Read:
34.31 MB/s4K Write:
89.39 MB/s4K QD32 Read:
319.9 MB/s4K QD32 Write:
279.4 MB/s
Sequential Read:
493.41 MB/sSequential Write:
289.07 MB/s4K Read:
30.35 MB/s4K Write:
76.48 MB/s4K-64 Read:
369.12 MB/s4K-64 Write:
272.77 MB/sAccess Time Read:
0.062 msAccess Time Write:
0.043 msCopy ISO:
258.18 MB/sCopy Program:
140.91 MB/sCopy Game:
188.08 MB/sScore Read:
449 PointsScore Write:
378 PointsScore Total:
1056 Points
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
71.68 fps &100% +93%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
62.99 fps &88% +69%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
62 fps &86% +67%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
37.22 fps &52%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
33.02 fps &46% -11%
AMD FirePro W4190M
31.41 fps &44% -16%
Intel HD Graphics 520
22.64 fps &32% -39%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
33.95 fps &100% +77%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
32.52 fps &96% +70%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
31 fps &91% +62%
AMD FirePro W4190M
19.89 fps &59% +4%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
19.13 fps &56%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
17.1 fps &50% -11%
Intel HD Graphics 520
2.95 fps &9% -85%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
24.25 fps &100% +299%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
21.35 fps &88% +251%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
20 fps &82% +229%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
6.32 fps &26% +4%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
6.08 fps &25%
Intel HD Graphics 520
6.05 fps &25% 0%
AMD FirePro W4190M
4.98 fps &21% -18%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
14.68 fps &100% +54%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
14.4 fps &98% +51%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
12 fps &82% +26%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
9.51 fps &65%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
7.05 fps &48% -26%
AMD FirePro W4190M
6.09 fps &41% -36%
Intel HD Graphics 520
1.7 fps &12% -82%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
38.46 fps &100% +245%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
30 fps &78% +169%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
29.89 fps &78% +168%
AMD FirePro W4190M
16.38 fps &43% +47%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
12.03 fps &31% +8%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
11.14 fps &29%
Intel HD Graphics 520
10.89 fps &28% -2%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
3.2 fps &100% +504%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
3.16 fps &99% +496%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
0.69 fps &22% +30%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
0.53 fps &17%
AMD FirePro W4190M
0.41 fps &13% -23%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
0.38 fps &12% -28%
Intel HD Graphics 520
0.06 fps &2% -89%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
38.95 fps &100% +89%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
37.48 fps &96% +82%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
34 fps &87% +65%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
20.62 fps &53%
AMD FirePro W4190M
16.87 fps &43% -18%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
16.28 fps &42% -21%
Intel HD Graphics 520
10.15 fps &26% -51%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
46.26 fps &100% +116%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
44.29 fps &96% +107%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
37 fps &80% +73%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
21.42 fps &46%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
18.72 fps &40% -13%
AMD FirePro W4190M
18.62 fps &40% -13%
Intel HD Graphics 520
11.62 fps &25% -46%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
43.31 fps &100% +47%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
42.14 fps &97% +43%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
41 fps &95% +39%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
30.91 fps &71% +5%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
29.41 fps &68%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
43.93 fps &100% +23%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
42.91 fps &98% +20%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
40 fps &91% +12%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
39.52 fps &90% +11%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
35.63 fps &81%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
51 fps &100% +29%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
47.71 fps &94% +20%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
46.69 fps &92% +18%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
41.78 fps &82% +5%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
39.63 fps &78%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
21 fps &100% +41%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
17.54 fps &84% +18%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
17.4 fps &83% +17%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
15.68 fps &75% +5%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
14.87 fps &71%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
58.31 fps &100% +24%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
56.89 fps &98% +21%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
56 fps &96% +19%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
49.5 fps &85% +6%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
46.88 fps &80%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
54 fps &100% +15%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
52.47 fps &97% +12%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
48.27 fps &89% +3%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
46.9 fps &87%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
46.82 fps &87% 0%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
46.43 fps &100% +127%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
43.49 fps &94% +113%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
39 fps &84% +91%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
20.68 fps &45% +1%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
20.44 fps &44%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
54 fps &100% +42%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
53.48 fps &99% +40%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
48.98 fps &91% +29%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
46.7 fps &86% +23%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
38.08 fps &71%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
903 Samples/s &100% +139%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
791 Samples/s &88% +109%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
534 Samples/s &59% +41%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
378 Samples/s &42%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
253 Samples/s &28% -33%
Intel HD Graphics 520
224 Samples/s &25% -41%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
1434 Samples/s &100% +52%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
1426 Samples/s &99% +51%
AMD FirePro W4190M
1034 Samples/s &72% +9%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
945 Samples/s &66%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
889 Samples/s &62% -6%
Intel HD Graphics 520
529 Samples/s &37% -44%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
508 Samples/s &35% -46%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
155.76 MPix/s &100% +57%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
155.73 MPix/s &100% +57%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
127.5 MPix/s &82% +28%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
99.46 MPix/s &64%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
12.28 GB/s &100% +129%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
9.28 GB/s &76% +73%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
7.38 GB/s &60% +37%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
5.37 GB/s &44%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
21.75 KOPT/s &100% +70%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
21.63 KOPT/s &99% +69%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
17 KOPT/s &78% +33%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
12.82 KOPT/s &59%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
43.4 fps &100% +117%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
33.9 fps &78% +70%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
32.4 fps &75% +62%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
20 fps &46%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
18.6 fps &43% -7%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
53.4 fps &100% +154%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
52.5 fps &98% +150%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
44.9 fps &84% +114%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
21.9 fps &41% +4%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
21 fps &39%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
20.4 fps &100% +214%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
20.3 fps &100% +212%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
18.7 fps &92% +188%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
6.5 fps &32%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
16.2 fps &100% +138%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
13.8 fps &85% +103%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
13.2 fps &81% +94%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
6.8 fps &42%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
1628 Points &100% +228%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
1590 Points &98% +221%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
1401 Points &86% +182%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
496 Points &30%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
483 Points &30% -3%
Intel HD Graphics 520
305 Points &19% -39%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
10414 Points &100% +113%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
10118 Points &97% +107%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
8526 Points &82% +74%
AMD FirePro W4190M
5401 Points &52% +10%
Intel HD Graphics 520
5291 Points &51% +8%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
4893 Points &47%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
4665 Points &45% -5%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
4243 Points &100% +164%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
4126 Points &97% +156%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
3517 Points &83% +118%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
1621 Points &38% +1%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
1610 Points &38%
AMD FirePro W4190M
1588 Points &37% -1%
Intel HD Graphics 520
935 Points &22% -42%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
3952 Points &100% +176%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
3813 Points &96% +166%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
3344 Points &85% +134%
AMD FirePro W4190M
1517 Points &38% +6%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
1432 Points &36%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
1424 Points &36% -1%
Intel HD Graphics 520
863 Points &22% -40%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
11179 Points &100%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
10951 Points &100%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
7641 Points &100% +124%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
7312 Points &96% +114%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
6224 Points &81% +82%
Intel HD Graphics 520
3681 Points &48% +8%
AMD FirePro W4190M
3649 Points &48% +7%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
3413 Points &45%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
3359 Points &44% -2%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
30495 Points &100% +268%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
27157 Points &89% +228%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
23777 Points &78% +187%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
9092 Points &30% +10%
AMD FirePro W4190M
8513 Points &28% +3%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
8281 Points &27%
Intel HD Graphics 520
7505 Points &25% -9%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
16940 Points &100% +169%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
16337 Points &96% +160%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
16180 Points &96% +157%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
6591 Points &39% +5%
AMD FirePro W4190M
6567 Points &39% +4%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
6287 Points &37%
Intel HD Graphics 520
6097 Points &36% -3%
Intel HD Graphics 520
38530 Points &100%
Intel HD Graphics 520
40401 Points &100%
Intel HD Graphics 520
39969 Points &100%
AMD FirePro W4190M
44477 Points &100% +65%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
43922 Points &99% +63%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
41557 Points &93% +54%
Intel HD Graphics 520
40867 Points &92% +51%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
39650 Points &89% +47%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
26992 Points &61%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
14821 Points &33% -45%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
76826 Points &100% +191%
Intel HD Graphics 520
66190 Points &86% +151%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
41161 Points &54% +56%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
39220 Points &51% +49%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
38601 Points &50% +46%
AMD FirePro W4190M
35930 Points &47% +36%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
26395 Points &34%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
63578 Points &100% +140%
Intel HD Graphics 520
58178 Points &92% +119%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
41248 Points &65% +56%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
40175 Points &63% +51%
AMD FirePro W4190M
37532 Points &59% +41%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
28455 Points &45% +7%
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
26525 Points &42%
3DMark 06 Standard12842&points3DMark Vantage P Result7959&points3DMark 11 Performance2350&points3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score26525&points3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score6287&points3DMark Fire Strike Score1432&pointsHelp&&&...&5500U, GeForce 940M2329&6200U, GeForce 940MX2330&4200U, GeForce 840M2336Lenovo ThinkPad P50s-20FKS00400
&6500U, Quadro M500M2350&4210U, GeForce 840M2361&4510U, GeForce 840M2370&3610QM, GeForce GT 650M2371&&&...
&6820HK, GeForce GTX 980 SLI (Laptop)22627
Intel Core i7-6500U, NVIDIA Quadro M500M
17.3 fps &34%
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5, NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
43 fps &83% +149%
Intel Core i7-6820HQ, NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
51.5 fps &100% +198%
Acer Aspire V3-575G-5093Intel Core i5-6200U, NVIDIA GeForce 940M
16.8 fps &33% -3%
Intel Core i7-6500U, NVIDIA Quadro M500M
34.4 fps &32%
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5, NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
98 fps &91% +185%
Intel Core i7-6820HQ, NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
107.3 fps &100% +212%
Intel Core i7-5500U, NVIDIA Quadro K620M
36 fps &34% +5%
Acer Aspire V3-575G-5093Intel Core i5-6200U, NVIDIA GeForce 940M
35.4 fps &33% +3%
Intel Core i7-6500U, NVIDIA Quadro M500M
62.7 fps &39%
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5, NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
144 fps &88% +130%
Intel Core i7-6820HQ, NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
162.8 fps &100% +160%
Intel Core i7-5500U, NVIDIA Quadro K620M
66 fps &41% +5%
Acer Aspire V3-575G-5093Intel Core i5-6200U, NVIDIA GeForce 940M
52.1 fps &32% -17%
Intel Core i7-6500U, NVIDIA Quadro M500M
137.8 fps &40%
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5, NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
279 fps &80% +102%
Intel Core i7-6820HQ, NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
348.7 fps &100% +153%
Intel Core i7-5500U, NVIDIA Quadro K620M
134 fps &38% -3%
Acer Aspire V3-575G-5093Intel Core i5-6200U, NVIDIA GeForce 940M
82.5 fps &24% -40%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5, NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
<span class="r_compare_bars_number__371_ fps &100%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5, NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
21.6 fps &100%
Intel Core i7-6500U, NVIDIA Quadro M500M
10.4 fps &40%
Intel Core i7-6600U, AMD FirePro W4190M
8 fps &31% -23%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5, NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
25.7 fps &100% +147%
Acer Aspire V3-575G-5093Intel Core i5-6200U, NVIDIA GeForce 940M
10.84 fps &42% +4%
Intel Core i7-6500U, NVIDIA Quadro M500M
18.6 fps &41%
Intel Core i7-6600U, AMD FirePro W4190M
14 fps &31% -25%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5, NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
45.3 fps &100% +144%
Acer Aspire V3-575G-5093Intel Core i5-6200U, NVIDIA GeForce 940M
18.28 fps &40% -2%
Intel Core i7-6500U, NVIDIA Quadro M500M
30.3 fps &100%
Acer Aspire V3-575G-5093Intel Core i5-6200U, NVIDIA GeForce 940M
22.74 fps &75% -25%
Intel Core i7-6500U, NVIDIA Quadro M500M
14.7 fps &37%
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5, NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
38 fps &96% +159%
Intel Core i7-6600U, AMD FirePro W4190M
13.64 fps &35% -7%
Intel Core i7-6820HQ, NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
39.5 fps &100% +169%
Intel Core i7-5500U, NVIDIA Quadro K620M
15 fps &38% +2%
Acer Aspire V3-575G-5093Intel Core i5-6200U, NVIDIA GeForce 940M
20.86 fps &53% +42%
Intel Core i7-6500U, NVIDIA Quadro M500M
43.8 fps &39%
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5, NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
100 fps &89% +128%
Intel Core i7-6600U, AMD FirePro W4190M
34.08 fps &30% -22%
Intel Core i7-6820HQ, NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
112.9 fps &100% +158%
Intel Core i7-5500U, NVIDIA Quadro K620M
42 fps &37% -4%
Acer Aspire V3-575G-5093Intel Core i5-6200U, NVIDIA GeForce 940M
42.27 fps &37% -3%
Intel Core i7-6500U, NVIDIA Quadro M500M
54 fps &42%
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5, NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
111 fps &87% +106%
Intel Core i7-6600U, AMD FirePro W4190M
38.42 fps &30% -29%
Intel Core i7-6820HQ, NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
128 fps &100% +137%
Intel Core i7-5500U, NVIDIA Quadro K620M
52 fps &41% -4%
Acer Aspire V3-575G-5093Intel Core i5-6200U, NVIDIA GeForce 940M
51.4 fps &40% -5%
Intel Core i7-6500U, NVIDIA Quadro M500M
94.9 fps &49%
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5, NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
195 fps &100% +105%
Intel Core i7-6600U, AMD FirePro W4190M
85.19 fps &44% -10%
Intel Core i7-6820HQ, NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
187.9 fps &96% +98%
Intel Core i7-5500U, NVIDIA Quadro K620M
73 fps &37% -23%
Acer Aspire V3-575G-5093Intel Core i5-6200U, NVIDIA GeForce 940M
73.46 fps &38% -23%
ultra (2013) 137.862.734.417.3fps
(2013) 94.95443.814.7fps
(2013) 48.938.322.911.6fps
(2014) 33.723.419.19.6fps
(2015) 82.632.819.512.7fps
(2015) 30.518.910.2fps
(2015) 56.533.315.213fps
(2015) 46.932.419.213.1fps
(2015) 35.629.616.214.5fps
(2016) 30.318.610.4fps
Noise Level
30 / 30 / 30 dB(A)Load
33.5 / 41.9 dB(A)
&&30 dBsilent40 dB(A)audible50 dB(A)loud
min: , med: , max: &&&Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)
Intel Core i7-6500U, NVIDIA Quadro M500MIntel Xeon E3-1505M v5, NVIDIA Quadro M1000MIntel Core i7-6600U, AMD FirePro W4190MMSI WS60-6QJE316H11Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5, NVIDIA Quadro M2000MIntel Core i7-6820HQ, NVIDIA Quadro M2000MIntel Core i7-5500U, NVIDIA Quadro K620MIdle Minimum *3030 -0%29.8 1%37.2 -24%30 -0%26.9 10%Idle Average *3030 -0%29.8 1%37.2 -24%30 -0%26.9 10%Idle Maximum *3030 -0%29.8 1%37.2 -24%30 -0%26.9 10%Load Average *33.542.08 -26%39.5 -18%42.1 -26%34.5 -3%30.4 9%Load Maximum *41.946.78 -12%43.2 -3%50.7 -21%42.1 -0%38.1 9%* ... smaller is better
&27.4 &C30.7 &C37.5 &C&&27.3 &C34.4 &C44.2 &C&&26.5 &C32.3 &C34.4 &C&
Maximum: 44.2 &CAverage: 32.7 &C
41.1 &C33.8 &C27.3 &C57.8 &C55.9 &C28.9 &C32.3 &C30.2 &C25.7 &C
Maximum: 57.8 &CAverage: 37 &C Power Supply (max.)& 46.3 &C | Room Temperature&20 &C
| Fennel FIRT 550Idle
&24.8 &C25.2 &C25.3 &C&&24.3 &C24.9 &C26.4 &C&&23.9 &C24.5 &C24.3 &C&
Maximum: 26.4 &CAverage: 24.8 &C
26.3 &C25.7 &C25.2 &C27.6 &C28.1 &C25.8 &C24.9 &C24.2 &C23.9 &C
Maximum: 28.1 &CAverage: 25.7 &C Power Supply (max.)& 30.5 &C | Room Temperature&20 &C
| Fennel FIRT 550
Intel Core i7-6500U, NVIDIA Quadro M500MIntel Xeon E3-1505M v5, NVIDIA Quadro M1000MIntel Core i7-6600U, AMD FirePro W4190MMSI WS60-6QJE316H11Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5, NVIDIA Quadro M2000MIntel Core i7-6820HQ, NVIDIA Quadro M2000MIntel Core i7-5500U, NVIDIA Quadro K620MMaximum Upper Side *44.245.8 -4%44.6 -1%42.3 4%36.7 17%36.5 17%Maximum Bottom *57.846.7 19%46 20%60.1 -4%41.3 29%51.2 11%Idle Upper Side *26.431.2 -18%25.8 2%32.7 -24%31.1 -18%23.9 9%Idle Bottom *28.131.9 -14%27.4 2%33.1 -18%36.2 -29%25.7 9%* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption
Off / Standby 0.18 / 0.37 WattIdle 4.3 / 9.7 / 10.2 Watt
45.7 / 55.8 Watt
max: &&&&&&&&Gossen Metrahit Energy
Intel Core i7-6500U, NVIDIA Quadro M500MIntel Xeon E3-1505M v5, NVIDIA Quadro M1000MIntel Core i7-6600U, AMD FirePro W4190MMSI WS60-6QJE316H11Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5, NVIDIA Quadro M2000MIntel Core i7-6820HQ, NVIDIA Quadro M2000MIntel Core i7-5500U, NVIDIA Quadro K620MIdle Minimum *4.38.6 -100%4.3 -0%18.8 -337%5.6 -30%4 7%Idle Average *9.716.2 -67%7.9 19%29.6 -205%8.6 11%9.6 1%Idle Maximum *10.216.7 -64%11.5 -13%30.3 -197%9.3 9%10.8 -6%Load Average *45.782.6 -81%43.3 5%90.4 -98%89.5 -96%36.9 19%Load Maximum *55.8131.8 -136%72.3 -30%150.2 -169%105 -88%54.5 2%* ... smaller is better
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
WiFi Surfing v1.3
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
Load (maximum brightness)
67&Wh, 6500U, Quadro M500M56&Wh, E3-1505M v5, Quadro M1000M90&Wh, 6600U, FirePro W4190MMSI WS60-6QJE316H1147&Wh, E3-1505M v5, Quadro M2000M90&Wh, 6820HQ, Quadro M2000M116&Wh, 5500U, Quadro K620MReader / Idle1107428 -61%756 -32%160 -86%860 -22%1728 56%Load129109 -16%141 9%51 -60%113 -12%247 91%WiFi298WiFi v1.3408286 -30%312 -24%106 -74%498 22%715 75%H.264537197 -63%141 -74%533 -1%667 24%
Pro+ 坚固的机身
+ 优秀的屏幕
+ 出色的键盘
+ 优秀的电池续航
+ 接口速度快
+ 出色的无线网络速度
+ 三年质保Cons- 借口布局
- 处理器性能作为工作站来说较弱
- 处理器无法完全发挥加速性能
- 不便于维护升级
- 无最新接口（USB 3.1，USB－C，Thunderbolt，M.2-2280）
- 屏幕闪烁亮度控制
In review: Lenovo ThinkPad P50s. Test model courtesy of Notebooksandmore.ThinkPad P50s是上一代的的Skylake更新，这也成为了这台移动工作站最大的问题。除了处理器，它并没有什么实质性的改变，你依然无法用到最新的接口（USB-C, Thunderbolt, M.2固态硬盘, M.2-2280）。我们甚至可以直接复制W550的评测总结，因为你会拿到手上的依然是一台缺少处理性能的轻薄工作站。当然这取决于你的需要，当然移动超低电压处理器也不算孱弱，不过我们的测试机甚至无法发挥应有的全部潜能。为什么超极本如可以提高热设计功率限制，而工作站不能呢？联想的不同产品团队显然需要增强交流。
这也把我们带到了ThinkPad P50s的另一个问题前面：。由于机身得到重新设计，它提供了所有的最新接口，更强的性能，而噪音散热却有了改善。P50s的优势在于更薄的机身和较轻的重量（包括电源适配器）。不过如果你真的关注便携性的话，的地位几乎无可撼动。ThinkPad P50s仍然是一台不错的移动工作站，但是它相比前代机型几乎没有改进。因此我们很难向用户推荐这台设备——特别是在这么强的竞争之中。如果你无法享受联想的教育优惠，那么联想和戴尔的设备售价将会十分相近。我们的教育机型的售价为1400欧元（约10172人民币），十分有竞争力，不过你也可以选择售价1440欧元（约10462人民币）的ThinkPad P50。你需要接受稍差的全高清屏幕，不过可以得到更强的性能和更新的科技。
关于最终得分：我们的评分系统在更新之后除了通用应用程序性能分数还包括了设备的工作站应用程序性能得分，这会影响设备的总分。例如P50s在办公笔记本电脑分类中将会得到85%的总分。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击。&
Lenovo ThinkPad P50s-20FKS00400 - 03/16/2016
v5Andreas OsthoffChassis90&/&98&&&92%Keyboard94%Pointing Device87%Connectivity65&/&81&&&80%Weight62&/&66&&&93%Battery90%Display86%Games Performance63%Application Performance82%Temperature88&/&95&&&92%Noise91&/&90&&&100%Audio68%Camera50&/&85&&&59%Average76%79%Workstation - Weighted Average
Pricecompare
联想 ThinkPad P50s-20FKS00400 笔记本电脑简短评测 Andreas Osthoff,&&(Update:&)