懂粤语的来帮忙翻译一下_百度知道
懂粤语的来帮忙翻译一下
佢聊返工等放工蛇王郁D诈胃痛随晕伤风脚冻放假俾佢即刻通街贡求同情花款几百种同 wear 水赠送每佢钱嗌肉痛送野俾 girl friend 手重*佢条搞风搞雨掘尾龙随等炒攞惯信封频频意制造内哄佢望罢晒工同嘈声响喇叭筒打交「啜」声屈尾十嗌松走精面卸晒膊累埋众专门搞搞贡★(music)★佢同打牌专搏懵明明求「卡窿」佢碰假惺惺偷睇四面哄佢钟意周身郁郁贡平逢请饮梗肚空同台干杯佢食餸同猜枚冇尾梗要打包几斤重*佢条搞风搞雨掘尾龙随等炒攞惯信封频频意制造内哄佢望罢晒工同嘈声响喇叭筒打交「啜」声屈尾十嗌松走精面卸晒膊累埋众专门搞搞贡*佢条搞风搞雨掘尾龙随等炒攞惯信封频频意制造内哄佢望罢晒工同嘈声响喇叭筒打交「啜」声屈尾十嗌松走精面卸晒膊累埋众专门搞搞贡★(music)★佢聊返工等放工蛇王郁D诈胃痛随晕伤风脚冻放假俾佢即刻通街贡求同情花款几百种同 wear 水赠送每佢钱嗌肉痛送野俾 girl friend 手重每佢钱嗌肉痛送野俾 girl friend 手重
提问者采纳
聊班等（想）班偷懒佯装胃痛随晕伤风脚冷让放假立刻满街蹿求同情几百种手段同 wear 水赠送（翻……懂）每轮钱疼（钱）给友送礼真条翻云覆雨恶搞龙随等炒攞惯信封（翻……懂）（概随等炒鱿鱼习惯拿XXX）意制造内讧盼望别全罢工跟别吵架嗓比喇叭打交「啜」声屈尾十嗌松（翻……懂）（概旦打架……）脸全丢光连累众专门恶搞面内容面重复汗颜粤语博精深………………
其他类似问题
为您推荐：
其他2条回答
补充楼随等炒攞惯信封句意思经收解雇信随等著抄打交「啜」声屈尾十嗌松句意思打架即刻逃走见另外面段些句面段同期望机翻译实太再加些看懂所翻......
《人办》百科里面有啊...
粤语的相关知识
等待您来回答
下载知道APP
随时随地咨询
出门在外也不愁&& 查看话题
编辑回复，帮忙翻译下
投了一篇英文，编辑给回复：Dear Dr Ma,
I can now inform you that the reviewers and editor have evaluated the manuscript "Characterization of the particle size fractions associated heavy metals in tropical arable soils from Hainan Island, China" (Dr Lingling Ma). I am pleased to say that it has been favourably received and publication with minor revision is recommended (see below and on /gexplo/).
Please consider the reviews to see if revision would be feasible. To facilitate further review, add line numbers in the text of your manuscript. Should you wish to resubmit you should explain how and where (i.e. by giving line numbers) each point of the reviewers' comments has been incorporated. For this, use submission item "Revision
Notes" when uploading your revision. Also, indicate the changes in an annotated version of the revised manuscript (submission item "Revision, changes marked"). Please follow the order "Revision Notes", "Revision, changes marked", "Manuscript", etc.
Should you disagree with any part of the reviews, please explain why.
Please strictly follow the formatting requirements as presented in the Guide for Authors.
Given that the requested revisions are fairly minor the new version is required within the month.
To submit a revision, go to /gexplo/ and log in as an author. You will find your submission record under Submission(s) Needing Revision.
When resubmitting, please present any figures, tables etc. as separate files. See the Artwork Guidelines on the home page right menu for further file naming conventions, referencing and format issues.
When resubmitting, please ensure that you upload the source files (e.g. Word) of all text and tables. Uploading a pdf file at this stage will create delays should your manuscript be finally accepted for publication. If your revised submission does not include the source files, we will contact you to request them.
I hope that you will find the comments to be of use to you and am looking forward with interest to receiving your revision.
Thank you for submitting your work to this journal.
Kind regards,
Kreeti Saravanan
Journal Manager
Journal of Geochemical Exploration
..........................................................
Important note: If a reviewer has provided a review or other materials as attachments, those items will not be in this letter. Please ensure therefore that you log on to the journal site and check if any attachments have been provided.
COMMENTS FROM EDITORS AND REVIEWERS
You may obtain the specific comments from two reviewers for your manuscript and should revise the manuscript as well as a point-by-point reply to the comments.
After you have taken care of all the suggestions, you can resubmit the modified paper to be evaluated for acceptance for publication on JGE.
Following, some associate editor suggestions to authors:
(1) Lines 227: Pichler et al., 1996 is not in the references
Reviewer #1: This paper contains data of potential interest to an international scientific community. The English language and the general composition of the manuscript is quite satisfactory. The following comments apply to the manuscript:
- The use of decimals is generally excessive. Only one digit more than the last significant one should be listed. This applies to the Abstract (% micro-aggregates), Results and Discussion, and Table 1. As an example: If the accuracy of the Cr determination is 5% (it is hardly any better as judged from the analysis of SRMs)the numbers for this element in Table 1 should be given with only 3 significant digits (e.g. 204 instead of 204.27 and 21.2 instead of 21.21).
- In the abstract it is stated that the mobility of the metals was "analyzed". What was studied is rather the "leachability".
- In fig. line explaining the symbols used should be moved to the figure text. The figure looks to "busy" as it is now.
Reviewer #2: Soil pollution by heavy metal is getting worse with the rapid development economy in China. This ms. presented the characteristics of heavy metals in tropical arable soils in Hainan Island, China.
I considered that this ms. can be accepted for publication after a minor revision. The detailed comments are as follows:
1. What is the detection limit of TOC measurement?
2. Page 8 line 159, the section of "2.4 Statistical analysis" is unnecessary in the article.
3. The authors should add some appropriate discussion related to the source of heavy metals.
4. There are many syntax error and punctuation abuse. I suggest the authors finding native English persons to help with the ms..
哪个虫友帮忙翻译下，谢谢
恭喜，楼主。这个杂志投稿后多久给消息啊？ 自己看啊，很简单的英语，恭喜你啊！ 恭喜楼主,小改后接收!:hand: 恭喜楼主啊 小修后接收啊。。。。 小修后录用，基本上都是简单修改的小问题 : Originally posted by
恭喜，楼主。这个杂志投稿后多久给消息啊？ 3个多月，有点慢 reviewer 2&&的意思是小修后接受发表~
reviewer 1 只提到要修改, 没说大改或是小改~
楼主专心的把2 位审稿人的意见好好的改~
录用机会比较高~ 好消息，小修后发表，LZ仔细回复评审意见。帮忙翻译一下！！！_英文翻译吧_百度贴吧
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&签到排名：今日本吧第个签到，本吧因你更精彩，明天继续来努力！
本吧签到人数：0成为超级会员，使用一键签到本月漏签0次！成为超级会员，赠送8张补签卡连续签到：天&&累计签到：天超级会员单次开通12个月以上，赠送连续签到卡3张
关注：3,208贴子：
帮忙翻译一下！！！收藏
Organizations and societies rely on fines and rewards to harness people’s self-interest in the service of the common good. The threat of a ticket keeps drivers in line, and the promise of a bonus inspires high performance. But incentives can also backfire, diminishing the very behavior they’re meant to encourage.A generation ago, Richard Titmuss claimed that paying people to donate blood reduced the supply. Economists were skeptical, citing a lack of empirical evidence. But since then, new data and models have prompted a sea change in how economists think about incentives—showing, among other things, that Titmuss was right often enough that businesses should take note.Experimental economists have found that offering to pay women for donating blood decreases the number willing to donate by almost half, and that letting them contribute the payment to charity reverses the effect. Consider another example: When six day-care centers in Haifa, Israel, began fining parents for late pickups, the number of tardy parents doubled. The fine seems to have reduced their ethical obligation to avoid inconveniencing the teachers and led them to think of lateness as simply a commodity they could purchase.Dozens of recent experiments show that rewarding self-interest with economic incentives can backfire when they undermine what Adam Smith called “the moral sentiments.” The psychology here has eluded blackboard economists, but it will be no surprise to people in business: When we take a job or buy a car, we are not only trying to get stuff—we are also trying to be a certain kind of person. People desire to be esteemed by others and to be seen as ethical and dignified. And they don’t want to be taken for suckers. Rewarding blood donations may backfire because it suggests that the donor is less interested in being altruistic than in making a buck. Incentives also run into trouble when they signal that the employer mistrusts the employee or is greedy. Close supervision of workers coupled with pay for performance is textbook economics—and a prescription for sullen employees.Perhaps most important, incentives affect what our actions signal, whether we’re being self-interested or civic-minded, manipulated or trusted, and they can imply—sometimes wrongly—what motivates us. Fines or public rebukes that appeal to our moral sentiments by signaling social disapproval (think of littering) can be highly effective. But incentives go wrong when they offend or diminish our ethical sensibilities.This does not mean it’s impossible to appeal to self-interested and ethical motivations at the same time—just that efforts to do so often fail. Ideally, policies support socially valued ends not only by harnessing self-interest but also by encouraging public-spiritedness. The small tax on plastic grocery bags enacted in Ireland in 2002 that resulted in their virtual elimination appears to have had such an effect. It punished offenders monetarily while conveying a moral message. Carrying a plastic bag joined wearing a fur coat in the gallery of antisocial anachronisms.Understanding why Irish shoppers responded positively to the fine, unlike Haifa parents, is the next challenge. How to reliably design synergistic incentives will be a hot topic for behavioral economists in the coming years. Meanwhile, organizational and social policy makers would do well to examine their incentive systems to see whether they’re unwittingly encouraging the opposite of the behavior they desire.
500强员工都在学的PPT技能，你敢不敢挑战？
当今社会，一些组织通过奖罚制度与大众的利己主义抗衡，鼓励更多的人服务公益事业。交通罚单督促司机依法行车，相应的福利政策激励大众关心公益。但奖励措施也会产生事与愿违的效果，与他们期望的结果背道而驰。
前人——理查德-蒂特马斯就曾说“掏钱买血只会减少血源”，经济学家以缺乏实验性证据为由对此持怀疑观点。但自那时起，新的数据、模型的不断涌现——充分证实了蒂特马斯的说法——“交易”应被重视，在经济学家关于奖励措施的认识里激起千层浪。
经济学家在一项针对女性的实验中发现，支付钱让其捐血减少了捐血人数的一半，而在慈善方面完全达到相反的效果。再例如：海法（以色列港市）的六所日间托儿所曾有规定接送孩子迟到的家长将会被罚款，结果迟到的家长增加了一倍。如此看来，罚款从心理上减轻了家长对老师帮忙多照管孩子的道德负担，让他们把迟到看成是一种通过金钱能买到的商品。
近来的几十个实验都证明，通过经济奖励抗衡利己主义只会事与愿违，挑战亚当-史密斯提出的“道德情操”。纯理论的经济学教授无法理解这种心理，但普通人都知道，我们在选择一份工作或者买一辆车时，所追求的不单是这件东西表面的价值——同时也是在向外界展示我们属于哪类人。每个人都希望得到他人的尊重，且希望别人眼中自己是有品德的、高贵的，他们不想被当成傻瓜。奖惩措施之所以事与愿违，就是因为对捐赠者而言做这件事并非出于无私而是因为金钱。企业的奖惩制度会因给员工传达这样的信息——老板是否不信任自己、是否觉得自己贪婪，而陷入困境。严密的监督结合奖励是教科书式的经济管理，也是让雇员郁闷的根本。
或许更重要的是，奖惩措施会干扰我们做事情的初衷，是出于私利或是热衷公益，被迫的还是因为信任，也会暗示是什么促使我们做这件事，虽然有时这种暗示并非我们的动机。通过对不道德行为（如乱扔垃圾）罚款、公开批评呼吁公民提高公德心能达到效果，奖惩措施却收效甚微因为它挑战甚至是在说我们没有道德情操。
这并不是说利己主义和道德积极性不能共存，只是目前的措施效果常不尽人意。理想地做法，政策不仅要利用利己主义还要通过鼓励公益心来实现社会价值目标。2002年，爱尔兰颁布塑料购物袋税以减少塑料垃圾，能收到实际成效是因为该法令在对违反者罚款的同时传递了一条道德信息：身穿貂皮大衣，手提塑料袋逛街是反社会的不合时宜的人。
接下来的任务，是从爱尔兰购物者不同于海法父母对罚款积极响应事件中汲取经验。如何合理制定协同激励将是未来几年行为经济学家热议的话题。同时，组织及社会政策制定者也应做好对奖惩体系的跟进监督以防止无意识的引导公民走向与初衷相违的方向。
Hope it can help u
登录百度帐号推荐应用
为兴趣而生，贴吧更懂你。或