文档分类：
在线文档经过高度压缩，下载原文更清晰。
淘豆网网友近日为您收集整理了关于Financial Simulation Modeling in Excel, Website A Step-by-Step Guide (Wiley Finance)的文档，希望对您的工作和学习有所帮助。以下是文档介绍：Financial Simulation Modeling in Excel, Website A Step-by-Step Guide (Wiley Finance) 36CHAPTER IIITHE REVISIONISTSThe claims of the revisionistsEveryone today knows that there is a group of people who radically question theprevalent image of the fate of the Jews under the Third Reich. These people callthemselves &Revisionists&, or, more precisely, &Holocaust Revisionists&. The mediabespatters them with idiotic smear words like &Auschwitz Deniers&, and lumps themtoge(来源：淘豆网[/p-6085121.html])ther with &Right-wing Radicals&.If you were to ask the average German what the revisionists actually say, and whatthey their statements are based on, he would be unable to answer. This is quiteinevitable because of
the media have strict instructions not topermit any expression or discussion of revisionist arguments. Thus, many people aregiven pletely erroneous impression that the revisionists deny Jewish sufferingduri(来源：淘豆网[/p-6085121.html])ng the Second World War. In reality, no one denies that a considerable number ofJews under German rule were interned in concentration camps, or that large numbersof deportees died of epidemics and exhaustion. Nor does anyone deny the reality ofshootings of Jews, particularly, on the Eastern Front.Revisionists dispute the following three points in particular:1) That there was a plan for the physical liquidation of the J2) The existence of &e(来源：淘豆网[/p-6085121.html])xtermination camps& with gas chambers for mass ki3) That five to six million Jews died in German occupied Europe.It is also not true that revisionism is a &Right-wing radical& movement, since it is notan ideology. It is, as Prof. Robert Faurisson likes to say, a method. Revisionistsexamine the official picture of the &Holocaust& using the same methods which aregenerally recognized as valid for other hist(来源：淘豆网[/p-6085121.html])orical periods.Of course, it is also true that most revisionists are politically to the Right, and thatsome of them are acknowledged National Socialists, but this has no influence on thecorrectness or incorrectness of their arguments. Whether the discoverer of a
is conservative, liberal, socialist, munist, is irrelevant to the history ofscience. What counts is the discovery of a new !Furthermore, some of the best-known revisionists, for example, th(来源：淘豆网[/p-6085121.html])e Frenchmen SergeThion and Pierre Guillaume, are on the Left.37A former concentration camp inmate as revisionist pioneer:Paul RassinierThe founder of revisionism also came from the left. Paul Rassinier, a Frenchresistance fighter, a Socialist and detainee at Buchenwald and Dora-Mittelbauconcentration camps. In his book Le Mensonge d'Ulysse (the Lies of Ulysses), whichappeared in 1950, Rassinier denounced the endlessly exaggerated tales told by f(来源：淘豆网[/p-6085121.html])ormerinmates of German camps. Over the course of years of research, Rassinier finallycame to the conclusion that gassings had either not taken place at all, or had takenplace only as the act of a few lunatics. In Le Drame des Juifs européens (1964),Rassinier wrote a few years before his death (1):&For 15 years, every time that I heard of a witness anywhere, no matter wherein the portion of Europe that was not occupied by the Soviets, who c(来源：淘豆网[/p-6085121.html])laimed tohave himself been present at gas exterminations, I immediately went to him toget his testimony. With documentation in hand, I would ask him so manyprecise and detailed questions that soon it became apparent that he could notanswer except by lying. Often his lies became so transparent, even to himself,that he ended his testimony by declaring that he had not seen it himself, butthat one of his good friends, who had died in the camps and whose(来源：淘豆网[/p-6085121.html]) good faithhe could not doubt, had told him about it. I covered thousands and thousandsof kilometers throughout Europe in this way.&Since nobody else wanted to print Rassinier's works, he finally had them published bya publishing house closely associated with the &Extreme Right& (Les Sept Couleurs).The hypocrites who reproach him for having them published them there, would nodoubt have preferred to see them never published at all.(来源：淘豆网[/p-6085121.html])Media vilification of the revisionistsIf we observe the campaign against the revisionists carried on by the media clique, weimmediately note a series of remarkable features:First, revisionist literature is flatly stated to have no credibility at all. Thus, a Swisswomen named Klara Obermueller wrote as follows in an anti-revisionist series (2):&If somebody came along today and reported the calling of a ongress to examine the question of whether (来源：淘豆网[/p-6085121.html])the sun revolves around the earthor the earth around the sun, he would either be ridiculed or declared pos mentis. It wouldn't occur to anyone to discuss the matter seriously... Asimilar thing occurs with the propagandists of the so-called 'Auschwitz Lie' or'Holocaust Lie': their statements that there was no extermination of the Jews, isso obviously false that it is basically unworthy of serious scientificdiscussion.&According to the above, the revisionists are purely and simply crazy. So whypersecute them? Why not just ignore them? Do people take you to court if you say theearth doesn't revolve around the sun?38Peculiarly, these same lunatics appear to be highly dangerous to the &Westerndemocracies&; they even appear to threaten the very basis of that society in anextremely serious way. A hack journalist named Patrick Bahners, writing in theFrankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung on 15 August 1994 in connection with the sentencingof Günter Deckert, revisionist and Chairman of the NPD, by the German legal system,said:&If Deckert's attitude on the Holocaust were correct, the Bundesrepublik wouldbe based on a lie. Every Presidential speech, every minute of silence, everyhistory book would be a lie. Therefore, anyone who denies the mass murder ofthe Jews disputes the legitimacy of the Bundesrepublik.&How can a handful of lunatics endanger the legitimacy of the Bundesrepublik? No,the journalists must finally recognize that there is something askew in this argument:either the revisionists are lunatics, in which case they aren't dangerous, and thejournalists can spare the energy wasted on all their hyste or theyare highly dangerous to the ruling system of the West, in which case they are notlunatics! You can' the media must decide one or the other.State prosecutors and judges as watch dogs for the official version of historyThe matter es even more suspicious when we learn that &denying& theHolocaust (a more correct term would be &disputing the genocide of the Jews&) areliable for criminal prosecution in several European countries (3). The model for thisimpudent interference of the criminal justice system in the freedom of research isperhaps the French &Loi Gayssot&, passed in France in 1990 (4), which provides forcriminal penalties for anyone disputing any matter decided by the InternationalMilitary Tribunal at Nuremberg. The sentence of the Nuremberg victor's tribunal hastherefore been declared infallible in F it has been canonized, as it were. EvenStalin did nothing of the kind.In the BRD, revisionists are prosecuted according to paragraph 130 of the CriminalCode (&Incitement to Racial Hatred&) Paragraph 131 (&Slandering the Dead&) andparagraph 189 (&Slandering the Dead&). The first paragraph was considerablybroadened on 28 October 1994, and now calls for prison terms of up to five years foranyone who approves, denies, or trivializes any criminal act alleged to have mitted by the National Socialists. Since that date, there have been thousands oftrials of revisionists in Germany just since 28 October 1994.In Austria, the so-called &Prohibition Law& against National Socialist activities hasserved as the Hexenhammer in suppressing the freedom of research on the Holocaustsince 1992.In France, Holocaust revisionists are liable for impri in theBRD, and in Austria, ten years. In practice, however, the penalties are notthat severe. Not yet!39Here are the sentences from some particularly spectacular revisionist trialsin the BRD:- in October 1992, Major General Remer, one of the most highly decorated soldiers ofWWII, was sentenced to 22 months without probation in Schweinfurt for &HolocaustDenial&, which, for the seriously ill old man, would have been equivalent to a deathsentence (Aktenzeichen Remer 1 Kls 8 Js 7494/91). Rather than serve the sentence,Remer, panied by his wife, went into exile in S- in April 1995, Günter Deckert, Chairman of the NPD, was sentenced to two yearswithout probation for translating a technical talk by US gas chamber expert FredLeuchter (Aktenzeichen IV Kls 1/95 - 2AK 1/95). That Deckert laughed several timesduring the translation, and shortened the sacrosanct Holy Word &Holocaust& to &Holo&for short, was considered to have aggravated the offense (5);- In June 1995, the chemist Germar Rudolf was sentenced to 14 months imprisonmentwithout probation in Stuttgart (Aktenzeichen 17 Kls 83/94). This sentence was passedon the pretext that Major General Remer had sent Rudolf's report on the &gaschambers& at Auschwitz (see chapter XII) to politicians, professors, and the media (6);- In May 1996, the publisher Wigbert Grabert was fined 30,000 DM for publishing ascientific revisionist anthology with the title Grundlagen zur Zeitgeschichte(Aktenzeichen AG Tübingen 4 Gs 173/95)- in May 1996, the political scientist and publisher Udo Walendy was sentenced to 15months without probation (Aktenzeichen 2 Kls 46 Js 374/95 STA Bielefeld) for&trivializing the Holocaust& (7).In none of these terror trials did the court spend as much as one single secondconsidering the arguments of the defendants. Every case assumed the&Offenkundigkeit& of the Holocaust, i.e., its alleged status as a &proven fact&. This&Offenkundigkeit&, believe it or not, dates back to 1945! According to article 21 of theLondon Statutes of August 1945, which established the procedural rules for theNuremberg Trials, no proof was required of &facts mon knowledge&. Just whatconstituted a &fact mon knowledge& was, of course, decided by the court itself -- a court which, in the words of chief prosecutor Robert Jackson, considered itsactions a &continuation of the war against Germany& (8). Thus, the status of the&Offenkundigkeit& of an assembly-line extermination of the Jews with millions ofvictims, was simply considered to be a &fact mon knowledge&, for which,therefore, no proof other than &confessions& and &eyewitness testimonies& is availabletoday.All these trials violate the basic right to free expression of opinion as guaranteedunder the Constitutions of all the states concerned. It is also illegal to deny adefendant any opportunity to prove the tru instead, expert reportson the technical impossibilities of the reported mass extermination are always rejectedwith reference to the &Offenkundigkeit& of the Holocaust.Generally, the very notion that jurists petent to decide matters of historicalfact is grotesque in itself. The following is an example:40In the book Hat Karl der Grosse Je Gelebt? [Was There Ever Really a Charlemagne?](9), the Munich scholar Herbert Illig disputes the existence of Charlemagne, anddeclares the whole period from 614 to 911 A.D. to be a product of fantasy. This entireperiod of 297 years, together with Charlemagne and all the other historical figures ofthe same period, are alleged to have been invented by subsequent falsifiers of historyfor political reasons. The absence of any structures built during the three so-called&centuries of the Dark Ages& is the logical result of the non-existence of this period ofhistory: an analysis of architectural monuments is said to show that the few structuresalleged to have been built during this period, were, in reality, built later.Due to an insufficient familiarity with the history of the early Middle Ages on ourpart, we shall refrain from expressing an opinion as to the value of Illig's book. If hisarguments should prove to be sheer fantasy, they will be ignored. If they should provecorrect, the author will be sooner or later have to be recognized as a genius. There isanother, third possibility, i.e., that Charlemagne actually lived, but never performedmany of the heroic deeds attributed to him. In this case, Illig's work would still have aseminal influence upon the writing of history by pointing out its ings --particularly, an overly blind trust in the reliability of the sources employed.One thing is for certain: Illig will never be hauled into court because of his book. Nojudge will ever jail him for &Denying the Genocide of the Pagans&, although, bydisputing Charlemagne's existence, he is, in effect, denying the mass murder of Saxonpagans attributed to him.In short, Charlemagne, or any other historical subject for that matter, may beresearched plete freedom and the broadest possible latitude. The samestatement is true of every other period of history -- except the Second World War,and, in particular, the fate of the Jews under the Third Reich. This fact alone ought tomake every thinking person deeply suspicious: &truths& that require protection bycriminal law usually turn out to be lies.The bankruptcy of the official version of history&Historians have only interpreted the Holocaust. The thing is to research it.&Ulrich Herbert, German historian, in the Frankfurter Rundschau of 13 February 1997,p. 7.The Lausanne daily Nouveau Quotidien on 2 and 3 September 1996, published twoarticles by the historian Jacques Baynac (an anti-revisionist). The first bore thepromising title &How the Historians Turned the Job of Silencing the Revisionists Overto the Courts&. That means: the governmental persecution of revisionists describedabove is the logical consequence of the inability of orthodox historians e upwith any counter-argument with which to answer the revisionists. While revisionistsRESEARCH the Holocaust, historians are simply content to INTERPRET it. Thefacts are irrelevant.An excellent example of this may be seen in Gunnar Heinsohn's book WarumAuschwitz? [Why Auschwitz?] (10). At the very beginning of the book, Heinsohnmentions an alleged Himmler order issued on 25 November 1944 on the disassembly41of the gas chambers at Auschwitz. This Himmler order has haunted Holocaustliterature for decades. No source for it is ever given, since no such order has ever beenfound. We don't know which historian invented this lie, since the Holocaust scribblerssimply copy all their nonsense back and forth.With mock seriousness, Heinsohn lists &Two Hundred Forty Recognized Theories onAuschwitz&, ments upon them at the end of the book (&Theory no. 20:Auschwitz as the Punishment of the Jews for Worshipping Female Deities&. Theoryno. 33: &Auschwitz as Preparation for the Restoration of Israel So That All SurvivingJews May Gather Together and Fulfill the Conditions for ing of the End DaysThrough the Christian God&, etc., etc). He es to the conclusion that Hitlerwished to exterminate the Jews because he hoped that, &with the disappearance of theJews of flesh and blood, the law of the sanctity of life, as well as mandmentsof love and righteousness, would be lost. He wished to create the right to kill, in orderto create strategic advantages for the Germans in the conquering of living space&(cover blurb).In the Middle Ages, scholars engaged plex disputes as to how many angelscould dance on the head of a pin. The existence of angels was never cast in doubt, it was simply assumed as an axiom. Holocaust writers act in the sameway. The existence of an &assembly line mass extermination& is assumed as an axiom,without any regard to the need for proof. They then proceed to speculate in a vacuum,far removed from historical realities, on the psychological and sociological factorswhich led to the assembly-line killing of Jews in the third Reich&, etc., etc., just asmedieval scholars speculated upon the sex of the number of angels dancing on thepinhead.Revisionists ask very different questions, such as: What do the documents show aboutAuschwitz? How reliable are the eyewitnesses? What was the capacity of thecrematoria? How quickly does Zyklon B evaporate, and at which temperatures? Didthe &gas chambers& possess an efficient ventilation system? How did the Zyklon Benter the &gas chambers&? Are there any traces of cyanides in the mortar samples fromthe &gas chambers&?In other words, on the one hand,
on the other, stands primitivesuperstition. There is no promise between the two opposing parties. Thatis why the historians, to borrow a phrase from Baynac, have turned the job ofsilencing the revisionists over to the courts.Notes:1) Paul Rassinier, Le Drame des juifs européens, Les Sept Couleurs, 1964, reprintedby La Vieille Taupe, Paris, p. 79.2) Weltwoche series, &Auschwitz und die 'Auschwitz-Lüge'&, 9, 16, and 23 December1993, 3 articles.423) So far (early 1997) Switzerland, Belgium, and Spain have passed anti-revisionistmuzzle laws in addition to France, Germany, and Austria. In Belgium and Spain,however, there appears to be little danger of their being used -- for the moment.4) The &Loi Gayssot&, see ric Delcroix, La Police de la Pensée contre leRévisionnisme, RHR, Colombes Cedex/F. 1994.5) See, in this regard, Günther Anntohn/Henri Roques, Der Fall Günter Deckert,DADC, Germania Verlag, Weinheim 1995.6) See, in this regard no. Herbert Verbeke (publisher) Kardinalfragen zurZeitgeschichte, Vrij Historisch Onderzoek, Berchem 1996.7) Compare, in this regard, issue no. 69 of Historische Tatsachen.8) Prosecutor Jackson's speech before the Tribunal, 26 July 1946.9) Heribert Illig, Hat Karl der Grosse je gelebt?, Mantis Verlag, Graefeling, 1995.10) Gunnar Heinsohn, Warum Auschwitz?, Rowohl, Hamburg, 1995.43CHAPTER IVWHAT IF THE REVISIONISTS ARE RIGHT?Let's just assume that the official &truth& on the Holocaust is a lie, and that therevisionists are right. The result would be a recognition that there was indeed aPERSECUTION OF JEWS under the Third Reich, but no deliberateEXTERMINATION OF JEWS; that the gas chambers and gas vans were an inventionof atrocity propaganda, just like the children with their hands chopped off during theFirst World W that not five to six million, but less than one million Jews died in theareas under G that of these Jewish victims, only a small percentagewere killed, while the rest died chiefly of epidemics and deprivation in the camps andghettos. What would be the result of this revelation? They are easy to imagine:- A worldwide wave of anti-J- A wave of nationalism in Germany: politicians, intellectuals, historians andjournalists would be held up to contempt- The renewed possibility of an objective, factual discussion of National Socialism.We might, as a result, even be able to borrow some of their constructive measures indealing with the problems of unemployment, the declining birth rate, and wide-- Nationalism, in the sense of a true representation of national interests and a defenceof the national identity, would regain its legitimacy. The Germans could again say,without shame, &Germany for the Germans!& The French could again say, withoutshame, &France for the French!& The psychological and political factors which haveenabled mass invasion from the Third World,- The rulers and manipulators of public opinion would be discredited, not only inGermany, but throughout the West. People would ask themselves why this wholecharade had to be propped up with censorship and brute force for so many decades,and in whose interests. Trust in the ruling cliques would be seriously shaken -- at atime of serious social and economic crisis to which the &democracies& have noanswer.We see that a general realization that Holocaust is a lie would have devastatingimplications, not only for international Jewry and the state of Israel, but for thepolitical and intellectual ruling cliques of the entire Western world -- particularly inGermany! The result would be a re-evaluation of all values, to borrow a term fromFriedrich Nietzsche. Everything would be different. Everything would have to re-examined.44WHAT REALLY HAPPENED?Prior to 1941: The Reich's Government demands Jewish emigrationThe Jewish policies of the NSDAP, from the very outset, aimed at continuallyreducing Jewish influence in Germany and at encouraging as many German Jews toemigrate as possible. This initial objective was pursued from 1933 onwards by meansof numerous laws and decrees which limited the number of Jews among lawyers,doctors, etc. by means of quotas, and which restricted the economic and politicalrights of the Jews. This continued, until at least 1938, practicauntil the Night of Broken Glass (1), not one Jew was ever sent to a camp just forbeing a Jew. If Jews were sent to camps, it was for militant anti-governmentalpolitical activity or mon crime (2).To encourage Jewish emigration, the National Socialists worked closely with anizations, which were interested in encouraging the emigration to Palestine of asmany Jews as possible. This National Socialist-Zionist cooperation has been fullydocumented by several authors (3), and to our knowledge is not disputed by anyone.Since the British mandate over Palestine effectively prevented Jewish immigration ofJews to that country, Jewish emigration to the majority ofGerman Jews preferred other immigration countries, particularly the USA. But theUSA also placed obstacles in the path of Jewish immigration (4).By 1941, however, the great majority of German and Austrian Jews had gone intoexile.After 1941: Mass deportation to camps and ghettosIn 1941, Jewish emigration was officially prohibited. This prohibition was not,however, consistently implemented in practice. The deportation of Jews to workcamps and ghettos began in 1941. This occurred for two reasons in particular: first,the Germans needed their labour, since a majority of German men were at the front.Secondly, the Jews indisputably represented a security risk. The Jew Arno Lustiger, aformer resistance fighter and survivor of several camps, has proudly boasted that Jewsrepresented 15% of all active resistance, yet the percentage of Jews in the Frenchpopulation at that time was no more than 1%. munist &Red Orchestra&anization, which did caused Germany enormous harm, was made upmostly of Jews (6).Other states have interned suspicious minorities with far less justification: thus, in theUSA, all persons of Japanese ancestry, even those with American passports, wereinterned in camps (7). This was done even though there was never a single case ofespionage or subversion by Japanese-Americans, as admitted by Ronald Reagandecades later.The Jews in individual German-ruled countries suffered from the deportation to awidely varying extent. Disproportionately hard-hit were the Dutch Jews, of whommore than two thirds were deported. On the other hand, according to Serge Klarsfeld,only 75,721 Jews were deported from France. This corresponds to approximately one45fifth of the total Jewish population at that time (8); of these, a great many weredeported, not on the grounds of their religion or race, but for being resistance fightersor criminals. This often led to deportation for non-Jews as well.The death rate in the camps and its causesThe death rate in the camps was extremely high most of the time. A majority of thesefatalities were due to disease. The most dangerous of these was epidemic typhus, adisease carried by lice. The insecticide Zyklon B, together with other products, wasused bat lice.In Auschwitz, the largest concentration camp -- the term &extermination camp& is notthe correct expression -- epidemic typhus was especially dangerous in late summerand autumn. The epidemic reached its climax between 7-11 September 1942, with anaverage of 375 inmate deaths a day. By the first half of January 1943, the eeded in reducing the death rate to 107 but by mid-May, it rose again to298 fatalities a day (9).In the Western camps, the worst period was during the final phase of the war, whenmass deaths from epidemic disease claimed tens of thousands of victims. At the sametime, the German infrastructure totally collapsed as a result of Allied terror bombing,leading to shortages in the camps of medications, food, housing, and everything else.In his memoires, Chuck Yeager, the first pilot to break the sound barrier, describeshow his squadron had orders to shoot at everything that moved (10):&Germany could not so easily be divided into innocent civilians and guiltysoldiers. After all, the farmer on his potato patch was feeding Germansoldiers.&This means that the resulting starvation was deliberately created by the Allies throughtheir cruel and illegal
these same Allies then hypocritically setthemselves up as judges over the defeated enemy for failing to supply enough food toconcentration camp inmates!Particularly horrible conditions, including thousands of unburied bodies and livingskeletons, were found in April 1945 by the British at Bergen-Belsen. Thesephotographs are kept constantly before the public eye in ceaseless propagandacampaigns to this very today. What are the facts?Belsen mander Josef Kramer repeatedly and vehemently protested to hissuperiors that new inmates were constantly being sent to the hopelessly overcrowdedcamp of B his protests went unheard. Instead of simply abandoning the inmatesin the Eastern camps to the Soviets, the National Socialists evacuated them to theWest and allocated them among the Western camps to prevent their manpower fromfalling into the hands of the Soviets. Since the railways had been almost entirelydestroyed, the evacuation proces many inmates died en routefrom the bitter cold winter weather. In the camps which pelled to receive theremainder, conditions worsened by the day.播放器加载中，请稍候...
该用户其他文档
下载所得到的文件列表Financial Simulation Modeling in Excel, Website A Step-by-Step Guide (Wiley Finance).pdf
文档介绍：
Financial Simulation Modeling in Excel, Website A Step-by-Step Guide (Wiley Finance) 36CHAPTER IIITHE REVISIONISTSThe claims of the revisionistsEveryone today knows that there is a group of people who radically question theprevalent image of the fate of the Jews under the Third Reich. These people c...
内容来自淘豆网转载请标明出处.