怎样区分谓语和非谓语动词 语法书上有几个例句看不懂1:i'd better go now.2:why not sit down and eat a little?3:why argue with him?我认为1中的go 2中的sit down 3中的argue都是谓语动词 加上to 反而不对劲 而语法_百度作业帮
怎样区分谓语和非谓语动词 语法书上有几个例句看不懂1:i'd better go now.2:why not sit down and eat a little?3:why argue with him?我认为1中的go 2中的sit down 3中的argue都是谓语动词 加上to 反而不对劲 而语法
怎样区分谓语和非谓语动词 语法书上有几个例句看不懂1:i'd better go now.2:why not sit down and eat a little?3:why argue with him?我认为1中的go 2中的sit down 3中的argue都是谓语动词 加上to 反而不对劲 而语法书上说这几个都是省to的不定式?难道说1中不加had better就应该说i to go now?
您问题的题目和问题是两个概念,您问错了~要知道谓语动词和非谓语动词,最大的区别就是,实义动词是做谓语的,所以我们称之为谓语动词.但是有一种动词,我们需要他的动词意思,但是根据一个简单句子中只能有一个谓语动词的原因,不能让他成为动词了,那么,我们就把这个动词变成一种另外的形式,这种形式就是done.如果您看到这三种,那么他叫非谓语动词.至于您问题的内容.加to 和不加to 的问题.属于及物动词和不及物动词的语法范畴.他们最大的区别在于,及物动词,词后可以直接接宾语,而不及物动词,后面不能直接接宾语,所以必须有to 一类的介词相连.所以,你说的三句的谓语动词是肯定没问题的.至于您问的省略to 意思是说就是后面加动词原型.别的不用记.至于省略,最简单的就是make 这个词,正常情况是make sb to do sth但是习惯用法,所以用make sb do sth.这样叫省略.您说的第三句话是病句.除非是why not argue with him.才是对的~
谓语动词就是用来做谓语的动词，一个句子最少有主谓，就像我出去了，这里的出去就是的动词，而且它又是这个句子的谓语；非谓语动词就是在英语中，不能做句子谓语，而是担任其他的语法功能的动词，就叫做非谓语动词。非谓语动词有三种：动词不定式，动名词和分词。had better do sth最好做某事...
这些语法什么东西的本来发明出来帮助我们理解的，结果却被这些东西迷惑了，学语言不必要太追究这些。 学汉语时怎么怎么学的，就怎么学英语了。英语翻译Dick was a waiter in a small restaurant.One day a man came in and sat at one of the tables.Dick went over to find out what he wanted to eat .The man said he would like some chicken with potatoes and some other vegetables.“Fried chicken,_百度作业帮
英语翻译Dick was a waiter in a small restaurant.One day a man came in and sat at one of the tables.Dick went over to find out what he wanted to eat .The man said he would like some chicken with potatoes and some other vegetables.“Fried chicken,
英语翻译Dick was a waiter in a small restaurant.One day a man came in and sat at one of the tables.Dick went over to find out what he wanted to eat .The man said he would like some chicken with potatoes and some other vegetables.“Fried chicken,”he said just when Dick was ready to leave.“Very well,sir.”Dick answered and started to go to the chicken again.But the man called him back,saying,“One moment,waiter.Please try to cook it just right-not too little ,not too much,and choose a fat one if possible.”“Very,well,sir.”answered Dick quietly.“I will tell the cook.”Once more,he began to got to the kitchen,but for the third time the man stopped him with the words,“Oh,I forgot to tell you that I like the leg very much.” “Very well,sir.”answered Dick.“Do you prefer the left one or the right?”
他是一家小餐馆的服务员.有一天,来了一个男人,坐在一张桌子.家伙走过去问他想吃点什么.那人说他想吃鸡肉,土豆和其他蔬菜.“炸鸡,”他说当他是准备离开.“很好,先生.”他回答开始到鸡了.但那人叫他回来,说,“等一会儿,服务员.请试着煮得right-not太小,没有太多的选择,和一个胖一如果可能的话.”“非常好,先生.”他静静地回答.“我会告诉厨师.”一次,他开始到厨房,但第三次的人拦住了他那句话,“噢,我忘了告诉你,我喜欢鸡腿.”“很好,先生.”回答的家伙.“你是喜欢左边还是右边?“英语翻译If you are out at lunch time,you can eat in a restaurant or to McDonald’s or Kentucky Fried Chicken to have fast food.When you went to eat in a restaurant,you first go and sit down at a table.Then you read a menu and give your order,and_百度作业帮
英语翻译If you are out at lunch time,you can eat in a restaurant or to McDonald’s or Kentucky Fried Chicken to have fast food.When you went to eat in a restaurant,you first go and sit down at a table.Then you read a menu and give your order,and
英语翻译If you are out at lunch time,you can eat in a restaurant or to McDonald’s or Kentucky Fried Chicken to have fast food.When you went to eat in a restaurant,you first go and sit down at a table.Then you read a menu and give your order,and then your dishes are cooked.You pay the bill after eating.All this takes you a lot of time.But in a fast food restaurant,things are quite different.You just stand in a line in front of a counter.Above the counter you see cabbages,Coke,Sprite...You can choose any of them right away.After you give your order,people behind the counter get your food for you quickly.They give you your food on a plate,or in a paper bag counter get your food for you quickly.They give you your food on a plate,or in a paper bag or a box.You pay for it before you eat.And you can eat right there or take it away.Now many people like to go to fast food restaurants,because it saves time.This is why fast food has become very popular.However,more and more people now know that too much fast food is not good for their health.要通顺哦（有积分的拉,最后会给的拉）
如果午餐时间您在外面,您可以选择餐馆或者像麦当劳或者肯德基这样的快餐店.当您去餐馆吃饭的时候,您首先需要找到位子坐下,然后看菜单并且点单,然后等待你的食物.用过餐后你付账即可.所有这些过程会花费你很多时间.但是在快餐店就不一样了.你只需站在柜台前的一条线前,在柜台上你能看见圆白菜,可乐,雪碧等食物.你可以立即选择任何食物.在点单结束后,我们会很快得到所点的食物.服务员会把食物放在托盘,或者纸袋,或者纸盒里.你需要在吃饭前付账.同时,你可以选择在快餐店里吃或者带走吃.现在很多人喜欢去快餐店吃饭,因为这样可以节省时间.这就是为什么快餐变得非常流行.然而,越来越多的人知道吃太多快餐对他们的健康没有好处.
如果你在午餐时间外出，你可以选择在餐馆就餐，或是去麦当劳或肯德基吃快餐。当你去餐馆就餐时，你首先找到一张桌子坐下，接着阅读菜单并下单。然后，餐馆会烹制你点的菜。你在吃完后付帐。这一切都会花费你大量时间。但是在快餐店，情况大为不同。你只需站在柜台前的队伍里排队。在柜台上方你可以看到蔬菜、可乐、雪碧... 你可以立即对它们作出选择。在你下单之后，柜台后的员工会迅速给你拿来食物。他们...
如果你午餐时恰好在外，那就可以去饭店或麦当劳或是肯德基吃一顿快餐。
当你去一家饭店吃饭时，你首先要去一个桌子旁坐下来，然后看菜单点菜，接下来你的食物将被烹饪，吃完饭你要付账埋单。所有的这些都会花费你大量的时间。
但是在一家快餐店，事情就变得十分不同了。你只需要在柜台前排队等候，越过柜台看菜单：卷心菜，可乐，雪碧……你可以立刻选择任何一样。点过菜之后，柜台之后的人会很...
如果您是在午餐时间，您能吃在餐馆或到的McDonald’s或食用肯塔基的炸鸡快餐。 When您去在餐馆吃，您首先努力去做并且坐下来在桌。 然后您读一份菜单并且发布您的命令，您的盘然后被烹调。 您在吃以后付帐单。 所有这很多时间采取您。 But在一家快餐餐馆，事是相当不同的。 您在柜台前面的一条线站立。 在柜台之上您看见圆白菜，焦炭，魍魉… 您能立即选择任何一个。 在您发布您的命...Why families need to sit down and eat dinner together - Quartz
...and eat dessert together too.
(US Library of Congress)
Written by
Cody C. Delistraty, The Atlantic
After my mother passed away and my brother went to study in New Zealand, the first thing that really felt different was the dinner table. My father and I began eating separately. We went out to dinners with our friends, ate sandwiches in front of our computers, delivery pizzas while watching movies. Some days we rarely saw each other at all. Then, a few weeks before I was set to leave for university, my father walked downstairs. &You know, I think we should start eating together even if it&s just you and me,& he said. &Your mother would have wanted that.&
It wasn&t ideal, of course&the meals we made weren&t particularly amazing and we missed the presence of Mom and my brother&but there was something special about setting aside time to be with my father. It was therapeutic: an excuse to talk, to reflect on the day, and on recent events. Our chats about the banal&of baseball and television&often led to discussions of the serious&of politics and death, of memories and loss. Eating together was a small act, and it required very little of us&45 minutes away from our usual, quotidian distractions&and yet it was invariably one of the happiest parts of my day.
Sadly, Americans rarely eat together anymore. In fact, the average American eats one in every five meals in her one in four Americans eats at least one
meal every single day, and the majority of American families report eating
less than five days a week. It&s a pity that so many Americans are missing out on what could be meaningful time with their loved ones, but it&s even more than that. Not eating together also has quantifiably negative effects both physically and psychologically.
Using data from nearly three-quarters of the world&s countries, a new
from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) found that students who do not regularly eat with their parents are significantly more likely to be truant at school. The average truancy rate in the two weeks before the International Program for International Student Assessment (PISA), a test administered to 15-year-olds by the OECD and used in the analysis as a measure for absenteeism, was about 15% throughout the world on average, but it was nearly 30% when pupils reported they didn&t often share meals with their families.
Children who do not eat dinner with their parents at least twice a week also were 40% more likely to be overweight compared to those who do, as outlined in a research
given at the European Congress on Obesity in Bulgaria this May. On the contrary, children who do eat dinner with their parents five or more days a week have less trouble with drugs and alcohol, eat healthier, show better academic performance, and report being closer with their parents than children who eat dinner with their parents less often, according to a
conducted by the National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University.
There are two big reasons for these negative effects associated with not eating meals together: the first is simply that when we eat out&especially at the inexpensive fast food and take-out places that most children go to when not eating with their family&we tend not to eat very healthy things. As Michael Pollan wrote in his most recent book,
meals eaten outside of the home are almost uniformly less healthy than homemade foods, generally having higher fat, salt, and caloric content.
The other reason is that eating alone can be alienating. The dinner table can act as a unifier, a place of community. Sharing a meal is an excuse to catch up and talk, one of the few times where people are happy to put aside their work and take time out of their day. After all, it is rare that we Americans grant ourselves pleasure over productivity (just look at the fact that the average American works nearly
more per year than the average Frenchman).
In many countries, mealtime is treated as sacred. In France, for instance, while it is acceptable to eat by oneself, one should never rush a meal. A frenzied salad muncher on the m&tro invites dirty glares, and employees are given at least an hour for lunch. In many Mexican cities, townspeople will
with friends and family in central areas like parks or town squares. In Cambodia, villagers spread out colorful mats and bring food to share with loved ones like a .
In her book , Alice Julier argues that dining together can radically shift people&s perspectives: It reduces people&s perceptions of inequality, and diners tend to view those of different races, genders, and socioeconomic backgrounds as more equal than they would in other social scenarios.
It hasn&t always been the case that Americans don&t prioritize eating together and eating slowly. In 1950, Elizabeth David, who was recognized as the sort of soul-stirring American culinary evangelist du moment, as perhaps Alice Waters or David Lebovitz is today, published A Book of Mediterranean Food. She wrote that great food is simple. She proposed that meals didn&t have to come from fancy or trendy restaurants, and that enjoying basic meals with loved ones makes for the best eating. In one particularly salient passage, she writes:
&In the shade of the lemon grove I break off a hunch of bread, sprinkle it with the delicious fruity olive oil, empty my glass of sour white C and remember that Norman Douglas once wrote that whoever has helped us to a larger understanding is entitled to our gratitude for all time.&
Her equation for physical and psychological well-being is easy: Eat simply and eat together.
For the average American family, who now
nearly as much money on fast food as they do on groceries, this simplicity is not so easily achieved. Perhaps the root of this problem is cultural misperception.
In America, it seems snobbish to take time to eat good food with one&s family. The Norman Rockwell portrait of the family around the dinner table now seems less middle-class and more haute bourgeois, as many families can&t afford to have one parent stay home from work, spending his or her day cleaning and cooking a roast and side of potatoes for the spouse and kids. Most parents don&t have time to cook, many don&t even know how, and the idea that one should spend extra money and time picking up produce at the supermarket rather than grabbing a bucket of Chinese take-out can seem unfeasible, unnecessary, and slightly pretentious. It&s understandable to want to save time and money. It&s the same reason that small shops go out of business once Wal but in this case it is not the shop owner who suffers, it is the consumer of unhealthy and rushed meals.
How then do we eat better, not just from a nutritional perspective, but from a psychological one as well?
&To eat is a necessity, but to eat intelligently is an art,& said the 17th-century writer Fran&ois de La Rochefoucauld. What &intelligence& means in the context of eating is debatable. There are those who obsess over their food&where it is sourced, if it is organic, the nebulous desire for culinary &originality&&who are known in the US as &foodies& and in France as generation , both of which are the hipsters of cuisine, moneyed and sometimes picky. But this doesn&t seem quite like &intelligence& as de La Rochefoucauld meant it.
Perhaps to &eat intelligently,& one needs only to eat together. Although it would be nice to eat healthily as well, even take-out makes for a decent enough meal, psychologically speaking, so long as your family, roommates, or friends are present.
It&s incredible what we&re willing to make time for if we&re motivated. (Although we often end up just a bit too squeezed to make it to the gym in the morning, we can still find time to go to the movies after work.) Perhaps seeing eating together not as another appointment on a busy schedule, but rather as an opportunity to de-stress, a chance to catch up with those whom we love then, could help our children do better in school, get in better shape, and be less likely to abuse drugs and alcohol. Eating together also led children to report better relationships with their parents and surely relationships between adults can similarly benefit.
On our last night before I left home to return to school, my father and I went out to our favorite hometown restaurant, a Sichuan place where we always order the same thing: Yu Xiang Qiezi for me, Black Date Chicken for him. But even after 60 years of life on this planet and countless dinners here, he still could not properly hold a pair of chopsticks. &Let me help,& I said, and after a little resistance, he obliged me. &See you have to hold this one perfectly still,& I said, motioning to the chopstick in my left hand, &while you move this one to pick up your food.& The waiter came with another bowl of rice on which he would try. He nodded. &I think I&ve got it,& he said, delicately holding the chopsticks between his fingers. &The chopsticks each have an individual role, but in order not to drop your food, they have to work together. Right?& I smiled. &Exactly.&
This post originally appeared at . More from our sister site:
Read full story