in general和in conclusion有什么区别?
°花舍°2146
in general 是大体上的意思 in conclusion是总的来说 是总结句
为您推荐：
其他类似问题
扫描下载二维码As a conclusion是什么意思_百度知道
As a conclusion是什么意思
提问者采纳
作为总结，总之，
其他类似问题
为您推荐：
其他1条回答
一般用于文章的最尾自然段开头的句子最后啊。希望能帮助到你，总而言之
conclusion的相关知识
等待您来回答
下载知道APP
随时随地咨询
出门在外也不愁In conclusion
IN CONCLUSION
&The only incomprehensible thing about the universe is that it
is comprehensible.& Albert Einstein
There is something about the human race that separates us from the animals,
or at least we believe there is, but is it true? It is difficult, if not
impossible, to describe what that may be. I have argued that I do not believe
it is our intelligence, and as an example I cited the case of those who
are born with some form of brain damage and ask if that places them on the
the level of an animal? Merely asking the question is enough to raise serious
indignation all round, and quite rightly so. I have also said that I do
not believe it is our appreciation of music, poetry, or any of the arts
that makes us human, as I believe that is only as a result of our intelligence.
I also do not believe it is our love for one another, or our desire to give
help to others where needed without seeking personal gain - exhibiting altruism.
Animals have been observed to show altruism. However, I dare say that expert
naturalists will claim that when we observe say, a herd of elephants working
together to rescue one of their young from drowning that they are only working
for the benefit of the herd as a group. That being the case you could use
the same argument for us humans.
We can say with confidence that animals exhibit love for one another,
and even altruism, they will defend their young, are able to plan ahead
and work together as a group. They exhibit joy and tenderness to their new-born
and sadness and mourning at the loss of a loved one. So what do they not
have that we do? I think the answer to that is imagination, and because
we posses imagination we view the world very differently from the animals.
It is, I believe, because we have the power of imagination that we are
able to marvel at the beauty of a mountain, or a sun set, or a wild flower,
or a painting. Imagination also affects the way in which people can relate
to one another, and have the ability to completely understand how the other
feels, sometimes without so much as word passing between them. All these
attributes contribute to making us what we are, human, but to be human is
far more than that. To be human is to posses understanding, to posses an
awareness of our environment, and furthermore, to be human is to seek knowledge.
Only a human being will look at a thing and ask 'why is that?'
When I peer through my telescope at a distant galaxy, or star cluster,
or at countless thousands of stars in the Milky Way, I'm not just looking
at tiny points of light or 'strange fuzzy blobs', I am looking at the universe,
at our home, and it is stunningly beautiful.
I'm sure my dog, Sox, can see the Milky Way, but I'm also sure she only
sees it as tiny spots of light and nothing more, if she notices the stars
at all. I, on the other hand, see gigantic spiral galaxies that may harbour
alien life, beautiful nebula where new stars are being formed, the remnants
of an ancient supernova explosion created in a star's final death throes,
the magnificent rings of Saturn and the moons of Jupiter. I see all these
things and more, and marvel at them today just as I did as a 13 year old
kid with his first look through an astronomical telescope. I'm still that
13 year old kid, he's never left. I find it impossible to look through an
astronomical telescope and not be moved by the sight of countless stars
in the night sky shining like diamond dust on a bed of black velvet. Multitudes
of stars beyond stars, stretching back and back and finally becoming so
many and so dense they appear to merge into delicate wisps of sparkling
mist. I also find it impossible not to wonder where we, the human race,
fit into 'the great scheme of things'. Are we here merely as observers,
to watch as the universe evolves? Or are we here to participate, to shape
the universe, to map out its - and our own - future?
Are we really here just by accident? Or are we at some deep level an
and integral part of the universe without which there could be
no universe? Have we to accept that having moved on from the early false
belief that the Earth was at the centre of the universe, that we must travel
full circle in our beliefs and accept that not only are we central to the
universe, but that we are the universe?
I have said that I do not believe in God, a God that created the universe,
planet Earth or the human race. I have also said that I do not believe we,
or the universe, are here for a reason, to fulfill a plan. I believe we
are just here.
I will now elaborate on these points in order to reflect more clearly
what I do believe.
I do not believe in God, the God as previously described here and in
the bible, a God that created us, cares for us, watches over us and occasionally
performs miracles for our benefit. No, I believe that is a fairy tale God.
That God, I am certain, is nothing more than a man made myth that is reinforced
by the church as they struggle to keep power, and wealth. That God was invented
by man to serve man's purpose. He was responsible for making crops grow,
for the weather, the rising of the Sun and just about anything that we did
not understand. In the past if a deadly disease spread through a population
killing people in large numbers it was thought to be the work of God and
prayers would be offered up asking for forgiveness of sins. Today we find
it far more beneficial to be vaccinated against disease and have efficient
sewerage systems and clean drinking water. As science has found explanations
for what were in the past considered to be great mysteries, so the need
to call upon God as a means of explanation has reduced. These days I cannot
think of any serious phenomenon that we need to attribute to the mysterious
workings of God, except perhaps the creation of the universe.
When we use the word 'God' we are referring to a supernatural being that
possesses power that far transcends anything that we are capable of. We
imagine God as having unlimited power, unlimited knowledge and having eternal
existence. I find it strange therefore that God is often depicted in human
form, as though He really is limited to a small physical shape. Perhaps
this is because Jesus is recognised as being the son of God, and Jesus was,
at least in appearance, human. I do not doubt that a man called Jesus did
live a life very similar to how it is described in the bible, but believe
that he was no more than a mere mortal the same as the rest of us. Was he
the son of God? I do not think so for one minute, nor do I believe he performed
miracles or rose from the dead. I am sure that Jesus was just a man, but
a man that cleverly orchestrated events so that he appeared to be following
the prophecies that foretold of the coming of the messiah.
The picture of God that we somehow have fixed in our heads as having
a human shape, must surely be wrong, a relic from our childhood and all
those cozy stories told in church. We know it is wrong yet it persists.
Even if we manage to rid ourselves of this image of God we still seem unable
not to form some sort of representative image of Him, whether it be in the
form of a nebulous spirit or an inexplicable universal force. God has many
No matter what image we prefer to use in our attempt to visualise or
represent God, I am sure it is wrong, for we always seem to visualise God
as existing within the universe. However, for God to be omnipotent
and omniscient He surely cannot be constrained within the confines of the
universe. He surely cannot be said to be even in any one place within the
universe, He must surely be omnipresent. For God to be all of these things
is impossible if we confine Him within the restraints of the universe, for
how could an omnipotent, omniscient and omnipresent God possibly be any
less than the universe in its entirety?
God can be nothing less than the entire universe. Every atom of it, every
star, planet, galaxy, rock, person, creature, is literally a physical part
of God, as God is embodied in all these things, every single atom. God is
us, we are God, the universe is God. We are all a oneness, a part of the
whole. It is impossible for us to examine God as a separate entity, just
as it is impossible for us to examine the universe as a separate entity,
for God, the universe, and ourselves, are all the one and same single entity,
there are no divisions.
Does this mean that we are, after all, here for a reason? No, I think
not, at least not in this context. However, the human race, will I believe,
play a vital and pivotal role in the development of the universe, but not
because that is the 'plan', but because that is what we do. We watch, we
study, we experiment, we learn, we change things. It is perhaps the one
thing the human race is good at, and in continuing to explore and learn,
we will, I am sure, achieve wonderful things.
At some future point we will
surely gain mastery over the laws of physics, we will harness the awesome
power of the universe, and eventually we will even understand the mysteries
of time itself. When we have finally achieved mastery over time, we will
then reach back through the ages and by our collective will bring about
the creation of the universe. The universe was created because at some future
time we would bring about its creation, but until we understand the terms
'future' and 'past' we are unable to make sense of it.
We do know however, that at the moment of creation of the Big Bang from
a singularity the universe was contained in an area smaller than a single
atom. At this microscopic level it is the laws of quantum theory that rule,
and as we have already seen, in quantum theory particles not only interact
instantaneously - thus at faster than light speed -
they also have the
ability to travel back and forth through time. We also know that at the
moment of creation of the universe so time was created along with the normal
dimensions of space. We also know that at the quantum level particles such
as electrons and photons exist in a sort of phantom world of probabilities,
until they are observed. Once observed they then adopt the reality of becoming
a particle. It is this required act of observing to create reality that
has led some notable theoretical physicists, such as John Wheeler and Stephen
Hawking for example, to put forward an argument that it is only the presence
of conscious observers, in the form of ourselves, that has collapsed the
wave function of the universe and made the universe exist.
Could it be that at the moment of creation of the universe, when time
had no meaning, that events were put in place by ourselves, billions of
years in the future, that would bring about the creation event by our conscious
observations?
If there ever was, or ever will be, such a thing as a reason for our
existence, then that is it, we are here to do what we have already done,
to create the universe. After all, God can do anything, even bring about
his own creation.
Contact me:
It is not always possible to answer all emails, but all will be read
and noted. Thank you.
Book details page:in conclusion是什么意思，词典释义与在线翻译：
"last, I'll discuss family values"
in conclusion的用法和样例：
In conclusion I'd like to saythat ...
最後，我想说 ...
In conclusion, we should like to thank all those who have worked so hard to bring about this result.
最后，我们要对为取得这项成果而辛勤工作的所有的人表示感谢。
In conclusion, I'd like to say how much I've enjoyed staying here.
最后我想要说我在这里过得有多愉快。
The lecturer said in conclusion that he had treated the subject only imperfectly.
演讲者最后说，他只是简略地谈了谈这个题目，很不全面。
in conclusion的海词问答与网友补充：
in conclusion的相关资料：
in conclusion&:&最后；总之 ...
在&&中查看更多...
【近义词】
相关词典网站：