当前位置： &
求翻译：Please note that we are not able to publish all the comments that we receive, and that we may edit some comments to ensure their suitability for publishing.是什么意思？
Please note that we are not able to publish all the comments that we receive, and that we may edit some comments to ensure their suitability for publishing.
问题补充：
请注意，我们不能够出版，我们收到的所有意见，我们可以编辑一些意见，以确保其出版的适用性。
请注意,我们并不能够发布所有的评论,我们接收、和,我们可以编辑一些评论,以确保其适宜性的发布。
请注意:我们不能出版我们接受，并且我们也许编辑有些评论保证他们的适合为出版的所有评论。
请注意我们不能够公布各项意见，我们收到，我们可以编辑一些注释，以确保他们适合出版。
还请注意我们无法出版我们收到，我们可能编辑的所有评论确保他们的适宜性的一些评论用于出版。
我来回答：
参考资料：
* 验证码：
登录后回答可以获得积分奖励，并可以查看和管理所有的回答。 |
我要翻译和提问
请输入您需要翻译的文本！[转载]COVER LETTER（投稿信）实用指南(经验经历分享)(转载零点花园)
已有 62421 次阅读
|个人分类:|系统分类:|关键词:投稿，SCI，EI|文章来源:转载
&COVER LETTER（投稿信）实用指南(经验经历分享)(转载零点花园)如何询问稿件及编辑答复！Dear Editor,I'm not sure if it is the right time to contact you again to inquire about the status of my submittedmanuscript(ref:****) although nearly one month have passed since I contacted you last time. Iwould be greatly appreciate ifyou could spend some of your time check the status for me.Best regards***老外的答复：Dear ***,Thank you for your e-mail. We would like to sincerely apologise for the long delay in reviewingyour article. Your article was sent to many different referees, most of whom felt that they wereeither unqualified or their time was too restricted to review the paper. We understand that youmust feel frustrated, and we are sorry for this. Please understand that we rely entirely on thereferee&s to return articles to us speedily. Unfortunately, this is not always the case. It would bemuch appreciated if you could suggest an alternative referee for your article, a person who may beable to review the article in a more appropriate time frame. Please forward this person's contactdetails (e-mail address) to us as soon as possible. We will do our very best to speed up the process.We apologize for any inconvenience that you experienced due to this delay, and we appreciateyour understanding and tried patience in this regard.邀请函上没有老外签名，无法签证背景介绍：老外的签名跟我们的盖章查不多，没有签名的东西是不正式的，我去参加某次国际会议，签证的时候才发现，粗心的老外给我的邀请函没有他的签名，我只好email 给她询问，并要求马上传真给我。我的去信：Dear Ms. Rose:I'm Whyerect from China，who plans to participate the 11th International Symposium on DataMining 2002 in Sydney. The poster number of my paper is 007.I found the 'OFFICIAL ACCEPTANCE LETTER' you sent to me was lack of your signature. I'mafraid this would cause some trouble when I go to the embassy for my visa. Could you please sendme a fax or electronic version of OFFICIAL ACCEPTANCE LETTER with your autograph?Thank you!RegardsWhyerect老外的答复：Dear Whyerect:Thank you for your message. I am sorry that the corrected invitation has not reached you. I haverequested a new mailing to be sent to you today.Best Regards,Rose我的再去信：Dear Ms. Rose:could you please fax a copy of my acceptance letter fist so that I could have enough time for myvisa application? The visa application will take me about 2-3 weeks according to the embassy.Thanks a lot!RegardsWhyerect老外的再答复：Dear Whyerect:The invitation letter for your presentation at SPIE's International Symposium Data Mining (22-27October 2002) has been mailed. An Adobe acrobat pdf file of the letter is attached to this messagefor your use. We look forward to your participation in Sydney.Best regards,Rose没有出席会议，索要论文集背景：会议论文被录用，但没有出席会议，对方邮寄了光盘，询问是否有纸质论文集。我的去信：Dear SeanThanks for sending the CD-ROM copy, but I have not received the book (the prodeedings), I wantto know whether a book should be included .As you know, the printed copy would be more believable and useful as a reference,If I want onehow much it cost? thank youBest wishesJinke对方回信：Hello Dr.A printed version is 125 plus whatever shipping and currency conversion costs. They can beordered and paid for through the same route as previously.CheersDr. Sean D. Dessureault2005 APCOM Chairman产品中农药残留检测付费事宜背景：我没有具体的和老外们联系讨论过什么投稿啊参加会议的事情,但是有过很多和他们联系其他相关事宜的情况.以下是和某德国实验室联系的E-mail,讨论的是在按照EP,产品中农药残留检测已经付相关费用的问题.希望也可以对大家有所借鉴!我的去信：Dear ****,I am oe work for ooCo., Ltd.I have recevied the fax about analysis payment. Could you give me detailinformation about your bank account. So that I can pay as soon as possible.Best Wishes,*****老外的回信：Dear *****,attached you find the invoice for the analysis of pesticide residuesincluding bank account information.In case of any questions please don't hesitate to contact me.Best regards****版权转让声明及确认校样背景：论文已被接收，编辑要求我提供签名的版权申明和确认校样，我与编辑之间的通信。我的去信：Dear editor,I've gone through this article and found a wrong word. The 143th line theword &m& shoud be &the&. I noted it in the query form.Please give me a back e-mail. Thank you very much.Best wishes.Yours,***老外的回复：Dear Dr. ***,I hereby acknowledge the safe receipt of the corrections.Thank you for your cooperation.Yours sincerely,****我的再去信：Dear ****,I've read carefully the 'Transfer of copyright agreement' and signed it. NowI e-mailed it to you.In addition,we will not order the offprints at the present time.Please send me a back e-mail if you receive this messenge. Thank you verymuch!Yours sincerely,***老外的再回复：通知我版权申明已经收到Dear ***,I hereby acknowledge the safe receipt of the signed copyright form.Thank you for your cooperation.Yours sincerely,****
背景：老外发给我的审稿人意见及mail老外的email:Dear***,Please find enclosed the re-review from one of the previous reviewers of your manuscript. As youcan see, he is now in favor of publishing your article if you can modify your paper to answer hisquestions.If you feel that you can answer his questions appropriately, then please provide a revisedmanuscript based on the recommendations of the reviewers together with a disk or CD of therevision using a standard word processing program. You must also send along with the revision acover letter that details your responses to each point in the reviewers' comments.Thank you once again for your interest in Ultrasonics Sonochemistry. I am sorry for the delay inprocessing your manuscript.Doinit L. Sr.老外的审稿意见：Reviewer Comments for USAM 2005.6Title of Paper: ***Authors: ***Ref. No. USAM2005.6RECOMMENDATION: PUBLISH WITH REVISIONI appreciate the progress and effort that the authors have made. I note some significant progress inthis revised article. By replacing &new& with the word of &simple&, I take back my argument aboutthe novelty of the method in making soft metal nanoparticles, because it is the first article thatreport to pulverizing Sn metal into the size as small as 50 nm. Maybe the word &facile& is moreappropriate.I am still having trouble understanding the mechanism of the formation of Sn nanoparticleproposed by the author. Because the hardness of Sn is 1.5 in mineralogical scale, where Mg andZn have 2.5 (Samsonov, G.V. &Handbook of the Physicochemical Properties of the Elements&IFI/Plenum, 1968, pp. 432), it is not surprising that Sn can be pulverizing into small particlesunder high-intensity of ultrasound. What I have trouble with is that the surface area should not belarge enough to have the authors worried about in reducing the surface energy of particles withaggregation (I calculated the surface area of Sn particles at 50 nm is c.a. 12 m2/g). I really don'tthink the oxide coating and solvent molecules would depress the aggregation because I don't thinkthere would be aggregation occurring.Overall, it is my opinion that the article should be published if the authors can clarify the questionabout the mechanism of aggregation.Please note that the references are not uniform in format from No 15 down.投稿信背景：我的投稿信Dear Sir/Madam,I am submitting here a manuscript entitled &**************&. The manuscript consists of 10pages of text, 2 pages of 4 figures, 1 page of 2 tables, 1 page of captions of figures.I would be grateful if the manuscript could be reviewed and considered for publication in your&****** &.Yours sincerely,Prof. ********老外请我审稿背景：小弟近来在本领域渐成气候，竟然有某知名国际期刊请我替某编辑审稿，我以不熟悉该领域为由，拒绝了他，原文如下：老外的来信：Dear Dr. ******Research Paper ID # No.007, entitled &**********&, with Prof. Smith as corresponding author,has been submitted to the International Journal of ABC.I invite you to review this manuscript forone of our Editors, Dr. John. The abstract appears at the end of this email, along with the names ofthe authors. We normally expect reviews of Research Letters to be completed in two to threeweeks, and reviews of other manuscript types to be completed in five to six weeks.Please let me know as soon as possible if you will be able to accept my invitation to review. Ifyou are unable to review at this time, I would appreciate your recommending another expertreferee.Please click the appropriate link at the bottom of the page to automatically register your reply withour online manuscript submission and review system.Once you accept my invitation to review this manuscript, you will receive an email ofconfirmation, and then the manuscript will be available for you to examine in your 'RefereeCentre' in our IJABC - Manuscript Central website. The email will tell you how to access this andhow to submit your review on-line. If you require any further assistance, please contact meat
I realise that our expert referees greatly contribute to the high standards ofour journal, and I thank you for your present and/or future participation.Yours sincerely****我的答复：Dear Dr. *****I am afraid that I can not make it because I am not familar with this topic. I would be very happyto review papers that are close to my research interests, e.g. Support Vector Machine.Yours sincerely******老外的再回信：Dear Dr. ******Thank you for replying to my invitation to review manuscript ID # No.007 for the InternationalJournal of ABC. It is unfortunate that you are unable to review this manuscript at this time.I will keep you in mind when future manuscripts come in that fall under your area of expertise.Yours sincerely*********讨论对方实验室资格的一些问题.背景：下面是我将某个产品送到德国某个实验室,按照欧洲药典检测其中的35 中农药残留的一些E-mail,主要是讨论方法验证以及对方的实验室资格的一些问题.对方的回复:Dear Dr. ***,Jack has still wishes (see below). Please would you provide a copy of an authorized license andsend it directly to Mr. John at &**& &&.Thank you very much in advance.Best regards,****我的去信:Professor ****,I have explained what you said to my colleagues and they agreed that additional validation is notnecessary. However, would you like to contact ** to provide a authorized license? Maybe it isnecessary when *** register in the other countries.For the testing report, writing the client as &***Co.,Ltd& instead of & ***Co., Ltd. Research andDevelopment Center of Plant Medicine& would be appreciated.Best regards.***对方的来信:Dear **,Please let me know whether the report about the pesticide analysis is OK now or not.Otherwise L*T cannot send the original of the report to H**.Best regards,G*r S*z文章修改过程背景介绍：老外发给我审稿人意见，我照着修改后发回。第一位审稿人（主审），建议发表，但是提出了一些问题，主要是提出：有些问题原文说明的不清楚或者机理解释的不合理，提供该方法的准确度、检测元件使用寿命等专业问题，并且提出语言需要修改和打印的错误修订。第二位审稿人（副审），建议发表，同样提出问题：机理解释有疑问，建议进一步表征等。我回复主要是依据审稿人的意见逐条回复，可能有些涉及专业词汇，基本上是一一对应。说明了修改了哪些内容，怎莫表示的等等。需要说明的是，该文章已经发表并印刷出来。2003 IF 2.39审稿人意见：Reviewers' comments:Reviewer #1: Major RevisionThis paper reports on the development of a stripping voltammetry procedure for the determinationof thallium and cadmium in water using a modified glassy carbon electrode with aLangmuir-Blodgett film of p-allylcalix[4]arene coating.The study is well planned and performed. Additionally, the topic that it cconsequently, I feel that the paper merits publication in ACA, but with some revision. Followingare some aspects for the authors to consider:1 The characterization of Langmuir monolayers is made as usual through the measurement of thesurface pressure versus area isotherms. Some characteristics of isotherms should be offered, i.e.,the limiting area per molecule (it seems to be around 0.8 nm2/molecule from Figure 2) and thecollapse pressure. Additionally, more information on LB film preparation should be included in2.3 section (p. 5) related to the solutions used and their concentrations.2 All reagents used for experimental work and the suppliers should be indicated in Section 2.2(p.2), not only for the Tl2SO4 reagent.3 The lifetime of the proposed electrode must be discussed with experimental data.4 The central idea of this study is the development of a new non-mercury electrode for thestripping analysis of metals. This means, additionally, the correct study of potential interferentspecies to compare with conventional electrodes. The study of interferents must be improved byincluding more ions such as Pb(II), Bi(III), Ni(II) or Cu(II) and giving results in a new table.5 The precision of the proposed procedure must be studied.6 The applicability of procedure to drinking water is doubtful taking into account the detectionlimit found (&1 mg.L-1) and the natural level of analytes in waters. In fact, the application that theauthors offer is to spiked clean water (lake water and tap water). Did the authors considerpotential application to polluted water?7 As the authors propose the simultaneous determination of Tl and Cd and since Figure 4suggests some overlapping of stripping g*L-1 level, it seems necessary ?voltamograms for bothmetals at a 150 to study the resolution of both signals in the lab, indicating the concentrationrange for both metals in which resolution is possible.8 The heading of Table 1 indicates recovery and precision for the tap and lake water analyzed,but the table does not include data for precision.9 The whole manuscript should be revised for some typewriting errors and the English should beimproved.10 In brief, I think that the idea is interesting but the authors need to improve some aspects oftheir work as indicated above n order to demonstrate its real feasibility.Reviewer #2: Minor RevisionThis is an interesting paper focusing on the use of LB films of calix[4]arenes for the determinationof thallium and cadmium.Its publication can be recommended, after considering the following points:1) Why are they assuming that the calix[4]arenes are interacting with the glassy carbon electrodethrough the phenolic groups, rather than through the hydrophobic aromatic allyl groups? Thispossibility would not be preferred using the LB technique?2) The binding of the metal ions would not be more favorable at the lower rim OH groups?3) Spectroscopic, and microscopy (SPM, TEM) investigation of the LB-Tl, Cd surfaces would bevery informative in this case.4) Considering that only one layer has been deposited, and the evidence provided by the authorsthat it remains permeable to large ions, such as ferrocyanide, how one can be sure that the metaldeposition is not occurring at the surface holes? Otherwise, how a non conducting layer wouldmediate electron transfer in the reduction/stripping process?5) A very interesting result would be the comparison between the behavior of the LB films of thet-butyl and allyl calix[4]arenes.Language revision will be necessary.我的回复：Following are our response about reviewers& comment to our manuscript No ***-***-00**0:1 The following sentence was additional among the text in order to contribute more information ofLB film.&The limiting area and collapsing pressure of p-allylcalix[4]arene is 0.75 nm2 per molecule and34mNm respectively on pure water & was provided in section 3.1.&Measurement of &-A isotherms and preparation of LB monolayer were performed with JML-04LB trough (Shanghai Zhongchen Company, P R China). The spreading solutions were prepared bydissolving about 1-2 mg of the compound in 10 ml of dichloromethane. All spreading solutionswere kept at 5 &C and renewed every 2 weeks.& was provided in section 2.3.2 CdCl2 and other chemicals were purchased from local company as analytical reagents and usedwithout further purification. Therefore, this sentence will be appeared in the text.3 The response of AllylCA-GCE did not change remarkably after two months. The lifetime ofproposed electrode should be longer. We add the first sentence in our revision.4 In order to make clear, one table about interferences will be appeared in our revision.5 The precision of proposed procedure were given in the table 2.6 We consider that this electrode can detect metal ion of polluted water. Unfortunately，suitablesullage sample was not found in our area.7 We want to ensure they won&t interfere with each other. It seems to the peak of thallium andcadmium could not be separated entirely for partly overlapping in Fig 4 A.8 We calculate relative standard deviation of method and provided it in table 2.9 we correct some typewriting errors which were appeared in our manuscript.10 The molecular orientation can be controlled easily using LB technique. The type Z LB filmmeans hydrophilic group interact with glassy carbon electrode.11 We have done experiment on electrode modified with calixarene(pasted on the surface of GCelectrode), that is, molecular orientation was arranged freely. The response decrease sharply. Wesuppose it can due to decreasing of amount of allyl group on the same area. Therefore, wesupposed that would not happened12 The spectroscopic or microscopy investigation is unnecessary base on the above reason.13 Metal can be deposited on the surface hole. However, the response of bare electrode is muchless than that of AllylCA-GCE. We suppose this can be neglected.14 The ferrocyanide is the larger ion, and it can not permeate the calixarene cavity and exchangeelectron with electrode. However, the supporting electrolyte can permeate the cavity freely.15 The electrode modified with LB film of p-tert-butylcalix[4]arene cannot recognize thallium andcadmium at all.16 We apologized for our poor English. We will try to improve it in revision.17 In order to highlight the change what we have done, the color of text changed will become red.要求减免版面费背景：文章已经被接收 但是要交版面费 虽然是老板出 但咱是发展中国家 能省就省这次减免费用是成功的 文章已经发表编辑部来信：Dear Dr&&,Thank you for choosing &&&&to publish your work. Your manuscript will be forwarded to theprinters next week. Also all manuscripts printed in Vol. 10, No. 4, 2005 will be available on ourweb site:
soon.We inform you that page charges:10 printed pages x $20 per page = $200 (two hundred US dollars)plus postage should be transferred to our account. You will receive 50 free reprints. If you wouldlike to order extra 50 reprints you may do so at an extra charge of $100.00 (one hundred USdollars) plus postage. We will send you an invoice. Please let us know how many reprints do youorder and to whom the invoice should be send. If you want to pay by credit card, please, let usknow, I will send you a form to fill in.Best regards,&&&我的回信：Dear Editor:We are glad to see that our paper will be published in &&&&. Thanks a million for your work.Although we have been supported by an external grant source, we must admit that it is not enoughmoney to pay page charges We hope to waive page charges expect for payments for languagecorrections and color figures.Best wishes,Authors:编辑回信：Dear Dr &&,After discussion of your special case all three Editors agreed to cover partially your page charges.We inform you that page charges will be: 10 printed pages x $5 per page = $50 (fifty US dollars)plus postage ($40), total $90 (ninety US dollars).Please let us know the address of the institutionwhich will pay the bill and to whom the invoice and reprints should be sent.Best regards,
文章被初步接收背景：投送文章被初步接收老外的来信：Dear*,Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you reviseyour manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased toreconsider my decision.For your guidance, reviewers' comments are appended below. In addition to the modificationsrequested by the Editor you should add the names of ALL the authors in the list of references(unless they are really too many, for instance over 12-15.If you decide to revise the work, please submit a list of changes or a rebuttal against each pointwhich is being raised when you submit the revised manuscript.Yours sincerely,Managing Editor附:审稿人意见Reviewers' comments:Reviewer #1: Ms. Ref. No.: GENE-D-05-000141) I do not understand why the authors refer to Komaguchi et al (who cloned the chicken Lmbr1gene) as our lab, since any of the authors are common.2) To complete Fig. 1 please mark the position of Primer 13 (R)3) Page 17 line 14, should be gAA & gAB &gBB4) Page 25 line 18, should be G我的回信：Dear Managing Editor:We have revised the manuscript according to reviewers' and your comments. In this revision, allthe authors have been listed in the references. In our point-by-point response attached below,reviewer comment is in larger fonts (12 pt) and our response is in smaller fonts (10 pt). In addition,Title and Coauthors have several changes. We look forward to hearing from you. Thank you.Reviewer #1: MS. Ref. No.: GENE-D-05-000141) I do not understand why the authors refer to Komaguchi et al (who cloned the chicken Lmbr1gene) as our lab, since any of the authors are common. Revised.2) To complete Fig. 1 please mark the position of Primer 13 (R) Revised.3) Page 17 line 14, should be gAA & gAB &gBB Revised.4) Page 25 line 18, should be G Revised.*******melody 提供的催稿信模板Dear Dr. ***:I'm not sure if it is the right time to contact you to inquire about the status of my submittedmanuscript titled &****& (Ms. Ref. No.: ****) although the status of &with editor& for mymanuscript have been lasting for more than ***** weeks. I am just wondering that my manuscripthas been send to reviewers or not?Best regards***我的一封投稿信Dear Editor：This was my article for your magazine&Preparation and Structure Characterization of Long SingleCrystalline CuO Nanoribbons& In this communication, we have developed a novel simple andconvenient route to the abundant synthesis of long CuO nanoribbons on conducting Aluminiumsubstrate. TEM and XRD studies indicated that these CuO nanoribbons were single crystal withsingle crystalline plane of monoclinic {111}. The nanoribbons obtained are about several hundredsnanometers in width, from tens to one hundred nanometers in thickness and their length can be upto one hundred microns. Because these CuO nanoribbons not only are perfect single crystallinebut also are single crystalline plane, they can be expected to have special properties and purpose,such as nanoelectronic device and heterogeneous catalyst etc. In addition, the novel method seemscan also be used to prepare 1D nanostructures of other metallic oxides.yours sincerely**************我的知识产权证明Dear editors:I am a Dr of **** University in China. Now I will submit my manuscript entitled &Fabrication ofCopolymer(core)-Palladium(shell) Composite Microspheres and Their Successful Application tothe Solvent-Free Heck Reactions& to Chemical Engineering Science, and none of the work hasbeen published or under consideration for publication elsewhere. This manuscript presents anin-suit synthetic method for the preparation of Poly (St-co-MAA)(core)-Pd(shell) compositemicrospheres with dense Pd shells coated on their surface. The wall thickness could be controlledin the range of 30-50nm by this coating process. The composite spheres showed very goodcatalytic activities in Heck coupling reactions and can be reused many times without loss of itscatalytic activities in the absence of organic solvent This method will attract great interest in thepreparation of other copolymer(core)-metal(shell) nanomaterials. So, I think this manuscript issuitable for it. I would be very happy if I can get your reply as soon as possible.If there are any questions, please contact with me.Authors: *****, Tel: +86-***-2852533 Fax: +86-***-2852533Current address: The Key Laboratory for Special Functional Materials, ******Corresponding author: ******The software used: Microsoft word 2000 (text file), Photoshop 6.0Yours Sincerely********Oct,20, 2004也是投稿信背景：我以前的老美老板写的投稿信,非常简单Editorial OfficeJournal of Physical ChemistryGentlemen:I submit the letter, &xxxxx题目&, by 作者. It contains our findings on the attachment of goldnanoparticles to functionalzied multiwalled carbon nanotubes. My coauthors and I believe that thisnew information, on a subject relevant to nanophase physical chemistry, merits consideration forpublication in The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. It has not been submitted elsewhereMy coauthors and I offer the following people as possible reviewers:Prof. xxxChemistry DepartmentUniversity of xxxxxxxxE-mail: xxa@ xx.xx.eduProf. xx xxSchool of Engineering and ElectronicThe Scottish Microelectronics CentreUniversity of EdinburghKing's BuildingsWest Mains RoadEdinburgh, EH9 3JFUKEmail: Prof. xx xxxUnit& de Chimie des Mat&riaux Inorganiques et OrganiquesUniversit& Catholique de LouvainPlace Louis Pasteur 1/3B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium,E-mail: We look forward to hearing from you.Sincerely yours,投稿人还是投稿信背景：我的投稿信Dear Dr. ****We would like to submit our paper entitled &*****& to *****. The present work has not beenpublished elsewhere and is not being submitted to any other journal. We will appreciate very muchif the present paper can be reviewed critically and any comment, suggestion and advice from thereviewers will be welcome.Correspondence and phone calls about the paper should be directed to **** at the followingaddress, phone and fax number, and e-mail address：Enclosure:1. An original and three copi投稿信及编辑回复背景情况：各位虫友，大家好！下面是我刚投稿的一点历经，分享给大家！我的投稿信:Dear Editor：Enclosed are three copies of a manuscript by *** titled&***&．It is submitted to be considered forpublication as a&Original Article& in your journal．This paper is neither the entire paper nor anypart of its content has been published or has been accepted elsewhere ．It is not being submitted toany other journal．We believe the paper may be of particular interest to the readers of your journalbecause it provides valuable data and a new method to predict ***.Correspondence and phone calls about the paper should be directed to *** at the followingaddress，phone and fax number，and e-mail address:***，Doctoral candidate of structure engineering,Dept. of Structural Engineering,*** University,** Road,***, P. R. China.Tel：***;Fax：***;E-mail：：***Thanks very much for your attention to our paper．Sincerely yours，编辑部回复：Ms. Ref. No.: ***-D-06-***Title: ***Engineering StructuresDear ***,Your submission entitled ***& will be handled by Editor *** .You may check on the progress of your paper by logging on to theElsevier Editorial System as an author. The URL is.Your username is: ***Your password is: ***Thank you for submitting your work to this journal.Kind regards,
背景情况：论文审阅以后迟迟未收到审稿人的意见，询问网上系统是否出了问题。我的去信：Dear Darren SpencerFrom Editor I knew the review have completed and uploaded their revised advice the onlinesystem around November 2. But I did not get it. So please get the revised advice from the editor. Iexpect you can send these information to my mailbox.Thank you very much.your sincerely&&&对方回信：Dear &&&,Thank you for your reply.Please be advised that I have requested that the handling editor of the paper to forward you on thereviewer comments so that you will be able to submit your revised submission.If you require any further assistance then please feel free to contact me.Yours sincerely,*********又一封投稿信Dear Editor William Pennington,We want to submit our manuscript with the title &**************& to your esteemed journal. Thepaper contains 18 pages, 2 tables, 5 figures and Supplementary material and here enclosed arethree hard copies.In this paper, we studied the synthesis, structure and characters of **************. To the bestof our knowledge, such ************** with ************** has been reported uncommonlypreviously. Therefore, we consider that this work is new, and fit for publication in**************. We promise that the paper is not submitted to any other journals. We reallyappreciate you if you can have it reviewed by the referees. Thanks a lot.If you have any thing, please contact us.E-mail: **************.Tel: **************; Fax: **************.With best regardsYours sincerely,**************减免版面费背景情况：论文审阅后同意接受，但要求我交纳一定的版面费，我没有交，是这样给他回信的！很短的一句话把老外给搞定了！Dear Editors:As there is no budget for publication charge in our research,I cannot afford to pay the page,sothat I would like to request for the waiver.英语论文写作常用经典句子背景情况：我早就发过这个帖子了，虽然和这次的要求不太一样，但是也可以参考嘛！！！！英语论文写作常用经典句子BeginningIn this paper, we focus on the need forThis paper proceeds as follow.The structure of the paper is as follows.In this paper, we shall first briefly introduce fuzzy sets and related conceptsTo begin with we will provide a brief background on theIntroductionThis will be followed by a description of the fuzzy nature of the problem and a detailedpresentation of how the required membership functions are defined.Details on xx and xx are discussed in later sections.In the next section, after a statement of the basic problem, various situations involving possibilityknowledge are investigated: first, an entirely possibili then the cases of afuzzy service time with stochastic arrivals and non fuzzy ser lastly, fuzzyservice rule are considered.ReviewThis review is followed by an introduction.A brief summary of some of the relevant concepts in xxx and xxx is presented in Section 2.In the next section a brief view of the .... is given.In the next section, a short review of ... is given with special regard to ...Section 2 reviews relevant research related to xx.Section 1.1 briefly surveys the motivation for a methodology of action, while 1.2 looks at thedifficulties posed by the complexity of systems and outlines the need for development ofpossibility methods.BodySection 1 defines the notion of robustness, and argues for its importance.Section 1 devoted to the basic aspects of the FLC decision making logic.Section 2 gives the background of the problem which includes xxxSection 2 discusses some problems with and approaches to, natural language understanding.Section 2 explains how flexibility which often ... can be expressed in terms of fuzzy time windowSection 3 discusses the aspects of fuzzy set theory that are used in the ...Section 3 describes the system itself in a general way, including the ..and also discusses how toevaluate system performance.Section 3 describes a new measure of xx.Section 3 demonstrates the use of fuzzy possibility theory in the analysis of xx.Section 3 is a fine description of fuzzy formulation of human decision.Section 3, is developed to the modeling and processing of fuzzy decision rulesThe main idea of the FLC is described in Section 3 while Section 4 describes the xx strategies.Section 3 and 4 show experimental studies for verifying the proposed model.Section 4 discusses a previous fuzzy set based approach to cost variance investigation.Section 4 gives a specific example of xxx.Section 4 is the experimental study to make a fuzzy model of memory process.Section 4 contains a discussion of the implication of the results of Section 2 and 3.Section 4 applies this fuzzy measure to the analysis of xx and illustrate its use on experimentaldata.Section 5 presents the primary results of the paper: a fuzzy set model ..Section 5 contains some conclusions plus some ideas for further work.Section 6 illustrate the model with an example.Various ways of fuzzification and the reasons for their choice are discussed very briefly in Section2.In Section 2 are presented the block diagram expression of a whole modelof human DM systemIn Section 2 we shall list a collection of basic assumptions which a ... scheme must satisfy.In Section 2 of this paper, we present representation and uniqueness theorems for the fundamentalmeasurement of fuzziness when the domain of discourse is order dense.In Section 3, we describe the preliminary results of an empirical studycurrently in progress to verify the measurement model and to construct membership functions.In Section 5 is analyzed the inference process through the two kinds of inference experiments...This SectionIn this section, the characteristics and environment under which MRP isdesigned are described.We will provide in this section basic terminologies and notations whichare necessary for the understanding of subsequent results.Next SectionThe next section describes the mathematics that goes into the computer implementation of suchfuzzy logic statements.However, it is cumbersome for this purpose and in practical applications the formulae wererearranged and simplified as discussed in the next section.The three components will be described in the next two section, and an example of xx analysis ofa computer information system will then illustrate their use.We can interpret the results of Experiments I and II as in the following sections.The next section summarizes the method in a from that is useful for arguments based on xxSummaryThis paper concludes with a discussion of future research consideration in section 5.Section 5 summarizes the results of this investigation.Section 5 gives the conclusions and future directions of research.Section 7 provides a summary and a discussion of some extensions of the paper.Finally, conclusions and future work are summarizedThe basic questions posed above are then discussed and conclusions are drawn.Section 7 is the conclusion of the paper.Chapter 0. AbstractA basic problem in the design of xx is presented by the choice of a xx rate for the measurement ofexperimental variables.This paper examines a new measure of xx in xx based on fuzzy mathematics which overcomes thedifficulties found in other xx measures.This paper describes a system for the analysis of the xx.The method involves the construction of xx from fuzzy relations.The procedure is useful in analyzing how groups reach a decision.The technique used is to employ a newly developed and versatile xx algorithms.The usefulness of xx is also considered.A brief methodology used in xx is discussed.The analysis is useful in xx and xx problem.A model is developed for a xx analysis using fuzzy matrices.Algorithms to combine these estimates and produce a xx are presented and justified.The use of the method is discussed and an example is given.Results of an experimental applications of this xx analysis procedure are given to illustrate theproposed technique.This paper analyses problems inThis paper outlines the functions carried out by ...This paper includes an illustration of the ...This paper provides an overview and information useful for approachingEmphasis is placed on the construction of a criterion function by which the xx in achieving ahierarchical system of objectives are evaluated.The main emphasis is placed on the problem of xxOur proposed model is verified through experimental study.The experimental results reveal interesting examples of fuzzy phases of : xx,xxThe compatibility of a project in terms of cost, and xx are likewise represented by linguisticvariables.A didactic example is included to illustrate the computational procedureChapter 1. IntroductionTimeOver the course of the past 30 years, .. has emerged form intuitiveTechnological revolutions have recently hit the industrial worldThe advent of ... systems for has had a significant impact on theThe development of ... is exploredDuring the past decade, the theory of fuzzy sets has developed in a variety of directions,The concept of xx was investigated quite intensively in recent yearsThere has been a turning point in ... methodology in accordance with the advent of ...A major concern in ... today is to continue to improve...A xx is a latecomer in the part representation arena.At the time of this writing, there is still no standard way of xxAlthough a lot of effort is being spent on improving these weaknesses, the efficient and effectivemethod has yet to be developed.The pioneer work can be traced to xx [1965].To date, none of the methods developed is perfect and all are far from ready to be used incommercial systems.Objective / Goal / PurposeThe purpose of the inference engine can be outlined as follows:The ultimate goal of the xx system is to allow the non experts to utilize the existing knowledge inthe area of manual handling of loads, and to provide intelligent, computer aided instruction forxxx.The paper concerns the development of a xxThe scope of this research lies inThe main theme of the paper is the application of rule based decision making.These objectives are to be met with such thoroughness and confidence as to permit ...The objectives of the ... operations study are as follows:The primary purpose/consideration/objective ofThe ultimate goal of this concept is to provideThe main objective of such a ... system is toThe aim of this paper is to provide methods to construct such probability distribution.In order to achieve these objectives, an xx must meet the following requirements:In order to take advantage of their similaritymore research is still required before final goal of ... can be completedIn this trial, the objective is to generate...for the sake of concentrating on ... research issuesA major goal of this report is to extend the utilization of a recently developed procedure for the xx.For an illustrative purpose, four well known OR problems are studied in presence of fuzzy data:xx.A major thrust of the paper is to discuss approaches and strategies for structuring ..methodsThis illustration points out the need to specifyThe ultimate goal is both descriptive and prescriptive.Chapter 2. Literature ReviewA wealth of information is to be found in the statistics literature, for example, regarding xxA considerable amount of research has been done .. during the last decadeA great number of studies report on the treatment of uncertainties associated with xx.There is considerable amount of literature on planningHowever, these studies do not provide much attention to undertainty in xx.Since then, the subject has been extensively explored and it is still under investigation as well inmethodological aspects as in concrete applications.Many research studies have been carried out on this topic.Problem of xx draw recently more and more attention of system analysis.Attempts to resolve this dilemma have resulted in the development ofMany complex processes unfortunately, do not yield to this design procedure and have, therefore,not yet been automated.Most of the methods developed so far are deterministic and /or probabilistic in nature.The central issue in all these studies is toThe problem of xx has been studied by other investigators, however, these studies have been basedupon classical statistical approaches.Applied ... techniques toCharacterized the ... system asDeveloped an algorithm toDeveloped a system called ... whichUses an iterative algorithm to deduceEmphasized the need toIdentifies six key issues surrounding high technologyA comprehensive study of the .. has been undertakenMuch work has been reported recently in these filedProposedPresentedState thatPoint out that the problem ofDescribedIllustratedIndicatedHas shown / showedAddressHighlightsA study on ...was done / developed by []Previous work, such as [] and [], deal only withThe approach taken by [] isThe system developed by [] consistsA paper relevant to this research was published by [][]'s model requires consideration of ..[]' model draws attention to evolution in human development[]'s model focuses on...Little research has been conducted in applying ... toThe published information that is relevant to this research...This study further shows thatTheir work is based on the principle ofMore history of ... can be found in xx et al. [1979].Studies have been completed to establishedThe ...studies indicated thatThough application of xx in the filed of xx has proliferated in recent years, effort in analyzing xx,especially xx, is lacking.Problem / Issue / QuestionUnfortunately, real-world engineering problems such as manufacturing planning do not fit wellwith this narrowly defined model. They tend to span broad activities and require consideration ofmultiple aspects.Remedy / solve / alleviate these problems... is a difficult problem, yet to be adequately resolvedTwo major problems have yet to be addressedAn unanswered questionThis problem in essence involves using x to obtain a solution.An additional research issue to be tackled is ....Some important issues in developing a ... system are discussedThe three prime issues can be summarized:The situation leads to the problem of how to determine the ...There have been many attempts toIt is expected to be serious barrier toIt offers a simple solution in a limited domain for a complex problem.There are several ways to get around this problem.As difficult as it seems to be, xx is by no means new.The problem is to recognize xx from a design representation.A xx problem can trace its roots to xx.xx [1987] used a heuristic approach to simplify the complexity of the problem我的一次投稿过程我的一次投稿过程投稿后的第一次编辑来信Dear Dr &&&,I would like you to kindly email me an electronic version of your manuscript entitled:&&&&&&&&&&which was submitted for publication in &&&&&(please, note the new reference number)Please, note that your manuscript was not formatted properly.You will find instructions for properformatting appended hereafter.With my kindest regards,********Editor-in-Chief &&&&我修改后的回信：Dear Editor,Four months ago I submitted my manuscript entitled:&&&&&&&&&&&which was submitted for publication in &&&&&&&. But my manuscript was not formatted properly.Therefore,I received your email.Now, I have revised my manuscript and send an electronic file to you. I can most easily becontacted at the following:E-mail sddress: &&&&&&&&&&&&or Postal address:&&&&&&&&&&&&Yours sincerely,&&&编辑收到后的又一次回信：Dear Dr &&&,I thank you for sending the file, you should be hearing from me again in a couple of weeksconcerning its review.With my kind regards,***********15 天后编辑的最后回信：Dear Dr. &&&,I wish to inform you that your manuscript entitled:&&&&&&&&&&&which was submitted for publication in &&&&&&&, has been carefully reviewed by twoindependent referees.Both referees have expressed the opinion that, unfortunately, the research presented in yourmanuscript does not fall within the scope of the journal &&&&&&&&&While I presently cannot accept this manuscript for publication, I thank you for submitting yourwork to &&&&&&. I will be pleased to receive other manuscripts from you in the future.With my kindest regards,*********
背景情况：2005 年11 月，我参加了一个国际会议，中间与一个ISO 专家用憋脚的英语说了几句话，后来我给他发mail 希望能得到他的讲稿。我的原信：Dear ****:In Nov 4 afternoon, your speaking was excellent, I'm very interested in your lecture. Can youE-mail a copy and its ppt to me?Waiting for your letter.Best wishes,.Yours sincerely********老外的友好答复：老外过了几天才给我回信，信中说明自己为什么回信完了，并向我致歉，内容如下：Dear Mr. ******,I sincerely apologize for the delay in my response, but I have been extremely busy following myparticipation in the RFID China Forum last month. I had a number of critical activities withcorporate, ISO and EPCglobal which required significant international travel. As requested,please note the attached file representing my presentation at the event on 4 November2005. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or require additional information.Best regards!*********________________________________________________后面还留了他的详细地址、电话和E-mail。一次失败的投稿过程背景情况:最近运气不济,投稿总退,今天又被退了,各位仁兄多提宝贵意见和建议.我的投稿信:Dear editor,I on behalf of my co-authors submit our manuscript entitled &********& to your esteemed journal ******** as a communication. In this communication, we reported******** and ******** , respectively, resulting from ********* . More importantly, the********* represents the *********, which is highly significant to the *********. In addition,we promise that the paper is not submitted to any other journals. Thanks a lot.Yours sincerely，********半月后编辑部退稿信:Dear Professor &&&Ref.:*********Title : *********Thank you for choosing to submit your article for consideration for publication in *********. Iregret to inform you however, that your article will not be considered further. Communications arepreliminary accounts of original and significant work and therefore rapid publication must bejustified. I am sorry to say that on this occasion your article will undergo no furtherprocessing. The rejection rate for Communications submitted to ******** is ~65 %.I am sorry we could not be of further assistance on this occasion.Yours sincerely*********对国外杂志投稿时如何写emai(最基本的也是第一步)转帖!背景介绍：对国外杂志投稿的时候，一般都是使用email 投递，除了正文文章作为附件发送以外，还需要写一封信，叫cover letter，一封好的cover letter 可以起到很好的作用，就好比你求职的时候的自荐信，要吸引住编辑的眼球，你就成功一半了。国外杂志编辑的权利很大，基本决定你的生死。cover letter 的内容主要需要想编辑详细的介绍你的文章的主要内容，突出文章的创新性，价值，还有你为什么要发表这篇文章，还可以简要指出目前该领域的发展方向，最好你的文章就是朝向这个方向的。其他就是常规要求了，用语恰当，格式规范等。投稿信模板：Dear Dr．Enclosed are three copies of a manuscript by Rose N ．Dipaola，Donna A．Gallo，and TomN．Roberts titled&Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Long-Term Transfusion Patients&．It is submittedto be considered for publication as a&Original Article& in your journal．This paper is～?Neither theentire paper nor any part of its content has been published or has been accepted elsewhere ．It isnot being submitted to any other journal．We believe the paper may be of particular interest to the readers of your journal because the studyit reports stated the HCV infection rate among long-term transfusion patients is higher than that ofthe general population and of short-term transfusion patients．Correspondence and phone calls about the paper should be directed to Rose N．Dipaola at thefollowing address，phone and fax number，and e-mail address：Rose N ．Dipaola，MDInstitute of Internal MedicineCleveland Clinic Foundation9500 Euclid Ave．Cleveland，OH44195，USATel：1-216-444-5360Fax：1-216-444-9580E-mail：dipao＠cesmtp ．ccf. OrgThanks very much for your attention to our paper．Sincerely yours，Rose N．DipaolaWestwolf 提供的投稿经验（1）到这里来确实收获不小，斑竹whyerect建议发一些老外的与投稿相关的信件。我会在这里陆续在这里登出来供各位参考。背景一：接到同行邀请参加会议，如果你的经费不是很足，希望得到资助，委婉一些提出要求。Dear Professor ***:Thank you for your invitation. My colleagues and I will consider whether we have anythingappropriate to present and will come to a decision within the next few days.The ACS web site is devoid of any information on the symposium you mention, and thedescription in your letter is not very clear. It would appear that you are attempting to interest theACS in a new area, and I hope you succeed. However, it would help in my decision if you couldbe a bit clearer. What is expected from me? Is it something new or a review of the previousfindings of my group?In addition, attending this meeting was not something I planned on. This means that my limitedbudget will not stand the extra strain. Therefore, it would help if I knew of any possibilities todefray participation costs.I look forward to hearing from you.****背景二：稿件被拒了，很生气，与主编辩论（最终这篇稿子是发了）我的去信：From: ********Sent: Tuesday, May 18,
PMTo: Subject: Message for ****lA little earlier, I received an email message from your office rejecting the manuscript I submittedas SUSC_edwardsacher_, editorial reference number SS 02192. Needless to say, I wassurprised at not being given the opportunity to rebut. Now that I have read the referees' comments,I am doubly surprised.Consider Referee A. His sole disagreement, without offering reasons to the contrary, is that thephenomena we find are attributed to several different free radicals formed on bond breaking. Heargues that stable free radicals in graphite exist only in vacancies and at surfaces. We agree. Wherewe appear to disagree is whether or not the breaking of a C-C bond creates a vacancy: his point ofview, as stated in his comment, is that such free radicals rejoin to reform bonds. Unfortunately,literature data going back many decades prove him wrong.I presume that Referee A is from the group that wrote reference 21 in the manuscript since theynote that one of their four attributions is given incorrectly in the manuscript. I thank him for it will be corrected in the next version.Now, consider Referee B. Of his list of major points, the first asks for clearer referencing, the nextfour ask that residuals and error bars be included in several plots, the sixth (erroneously numbered5) asks for a clarification in a figure and the last questions the applicability of a reference.While Referee A may not like our free radical formation mechanism, neither he nor Referee B(who doesn't mention it at all) has refuted it or offered evidence as to why it may not be so. It isinteresting to note that we, the authors, have, in fact done so in the middle of p. 12 of ourmanuscript, where we offer several interesting opposing views.Furthermore, our evidence for the presence of free radicals is not questioned, nor is our Nhybridization scheme ( which has never appeared in previous papers on the subject). Also notdiscussed are the supporting results of the Raman and TOF-SIMS studies. Based on all this, andmore I will not spend time discussing, we find it difficult to understand how you could possiblyreject the manuscript without the opportunity to revise it.Could you explain your decision? I look forward to hearing from you.***编辑的回复：Dear Dr. ***,Thank you for your message below. I understand your concern.I was most troubled by the incorrect listings in Table I of all four components from Reference21. Your letter says that the error was only in one of the four, but they all look different to me andapparently to the referee. There were also a number of other features which seemed to be easilyfound errors that gave me great concern not by the importance of any single error but rather bytheir frequency and the fact that they should really have been caught by the authors beforesubmission.Sincerely,********我的再去信：Thank you for responding so quickly. I have read your comment and compared it with thecomments of the referees. I must disagree with your contention that all four of the attributionstaken from reference 21 are in error. In fact, if you glance at reference 21, pages 325-327, you willfind their discussion of the attributions of others to the N1s peaks, and their assessments of thoseattributions. They are unclear as to their own view and ne we tried to give whatwe thought it was, which is probably why Referee A made his comment. However, we call yourattention to the first sentence of the last paragraph of the discussion, which begins with the words,&While we cannot definitely assign the N1s peaks .....&. If, indeed, Referee A is a member of theteam that wrote reference 21, the ideas expressed in his comment must have originated later. Isubmit that this is not a cause for rejection of the manuscript.Further, the comments of Referee B do not concern rather, they concern theaddition of residuals and error bars, whose purpose is to enhance and clarify our manuscript.Certainly, this is typical of requests made for revision.As I noted in yesterday's letter, none of this warrants rejection. Indeed, neither of the refereesmentioned it. Therefore, I request your permission to submit a revised manuscript. Could you tellme how to do this?Many thanks.***。。。。（再后来的信件我没有保存下）背景三：文章要求修改，而且力度不小评委的意见XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXREFEREE COMMENTS:XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXA-2 REVIEWSuggestions and comments:Paper gives a new assignment for the C1s and N1s XPS components of the CNx thin layer. Theauthors discuss it from a view point of sp and sp2 hybridization in the compound. Although Icannot believe their conclusion for the solid, reader will judge whether it is reasonable or not.Thus the paper should be published in order to open the discussion. I feel, however, there are toomany figures in the paper. The Residual plots in Fig. 2a and 2b are unnecessary at least. In themanuscript obtained by down loading the PDF file, there are many mistypes, probably occurred inthe transfer process.In the manuscript, 1. many hyphens or minus signals, and power components are dropped from themanuscript. 2. ri ented ? oriented ( in Abstract, page 1) 3. id ? did (page 2, line 18) 4. neighbor s ?neighbors (page 2, line 22) 5. tho se ? those (page 5, line 8) 6. peak f ? peak of (page 12, line 21) 7.+? ? N+? (page 12, line 25, page 13, line 1, Table II) 8. 3N4 ? C3N4 (page 14, line 20)B-2 REVIEW:Surface Science paper by: D.-Q. Yang, E. Sacher, &A spectroscopic study of CNx formation by thekeVN2+&. (SS02192)Authors have plot residuals in Figure 2a, as it has been asked. However the residuals clearly showpeaks instead of being straight line (the line of residual has wiggles & see top of Fig. 2a).This indicates that the peak fitting was not done correctly. To get the straight line the number ofpeaks or/and their positions and widths need to be determined correctly. Introduction of a newpeak means that a new chemical component is present and when a new position of the peak isintroduced it means that a different chemical component is present (this mean that a differentinterpretation of data have to be done to current one in the paper). Therefore, since all analysis andinterpretation of the data in this paper relay on this fitting procedure - I do not believe to currentinterpretation of the data given in this paper.In my opinion much better analysis of data is needed and/or the data needs to be taken with abetter resolution so that peaks in C1s core level are resolved before it is worth publishing in Surf.Sci.修改说明：Dear Professor Campbell:I submit the revised manuscript, &A spectroscopic study of CNx formation by the keV N2+irradiation of highly oriented pyrolytic graphite surfaces&, as well as nine revised figures. Therevision was carried out as a result of the comments of the two reviewers. Detailed commentsfollow.Referee AAs the reviewer notes, we do, indeed, attribute all the implanted N components to free radicals. Aswe noted, the free radicals are initially produced on bond cleavage by the irradiating beam., as wehave previously shown. The N can only react with these chain end fragments, retaining, at least tosome extent, the free radical character of the original fragments. Since the production of freeradicals by hemolytic scission has been known for many decades, we see no reason to defend thispoint.The reviewer&s next point has to do with the N1s XPS attributions used in the paper by Kusunokiet al. When one reads reference 21, pages 325-327, one finds their discussion of the attributions ofothers to the N1s peaks, and their assessments of those attributions. They are unclear as to theirown view and ne we tried to give what we thought it was, which is probablywhy Referee A made his comment. However, we call your attention to the first sentence of the lastparagraph of the Discussion, which begins with the words, &While we cannot definitely assign theN1s peaks .....&. If, indeed, Referee A is a member of the team that wrote reference 21, the ideasexpressed in his comment must have originated later. For this reason, we have changed ourattributions in the text, as well as in Table I, to agree with those of the reviewer, and note itssubsequent communication.Referee BMajor point 1: The difficulty here appears to be with the phraseology. What we meant was that theattributions from many sources c since they cannot all be correct, many of theattributions are obviously in error. We have reworded this to make it clearer.Major point 2: The reviewer asks to see residuals. This is easy to do, since we always use residualsin our peak fitting. Thus, we have replaced the figures with those showing residuals. Further, wehave added a paragraph to the Experimental section, to indicate the philosophy used in employingthe residuals. This was done to avoid any confusion with the criteria employed.Major point 3: The reviewer is concerned with the use of a straight line to represent the data in Fig5a, and wishes to see error bars. So as not to confuse the data, we show error bars for the firstpoints of each plot in the figure. Further, we point out the well-known problem encountered onangle resolution: the circle being detected at a perpendicular take-off angle becomes an ellipse asthe angle approaches grazing incidence, causing intensity errors. We note that, until an angle of60& degrees from the perpendicular, the data are well represented by a straight, horizontal line, andwe illustrate this for the uppermost of the plots.Major point 4: We do not exactly understand the overall thrust of this point, since several differentones are being made concerning Fig. 4a. We have added error bars to the first points, so as not toconfuse and overlap the data. In addition, the reviewer asks for rescaling, to more clearly see C3and C4. While we believe that such rescaling is unnecessary, and C3 and C4 are already clearlyseen, we actually tried to do this. We tried, and decided against, logarithmic rescaling of theordinate because the plots were distorted and the upper plots were compressed. We tried, anddecided against, another figure for the lower plots because we already have fifteen figures.Major point 5 (called point 4 by the reviewer): The reviewer asks for error bars. They have beenadded to the first points of Figs. 4b and 6. We have added them to all the points of Fig. 4c becauseof the uncertainty in establishing the precision of the abscissa.Major point 6 (called point 5 by the reviewer): The reviewer does not see any evidence for theshift of the highest peak intensity of the N1s spectrum in Fig. 1b. We cannot understand thisrequest. Fig. 1b clearly shows that, on irradiation, the highest peak shifts from the one near 400.5eV to the one near 399 eV. This is reworded to make it clearer.Major point 7 (called point 6): The reviewer notes that the original reference [24] concerns theAu-N bond and not the C-N bond. He is absolutely correct. We intentionally used this referencesince it deals with the type of analysis we were doing on nitride formation, and we thought thereader would find it helpful to be aware of this. However, we understand the reviewer&s point: ithas been replaced with another reference, on the C-N bond.All the minor points, some caused by problems with Word, as we notified you a few days after ourinitial submission, have been corrected. We thank the reviewer for noting them.We hope that the revision is acceptable.****背景四：在过去网络不好,数据库缺的情况下向同行索要论文是经常的事,现在咱们好多学校和研究机构仍没有足够的经费购买所有的文献数据库(即使现在在国外也不是每个大学能买得起所有的数据库). 下面是一封在明信片式索要文献的短信,我常收到(特别是电子邮件),也不时发出这样的索要短信.一般90%都能寄给你.Dear Dr(or Prof.). ***Please send me a copy of your article: &xxxxxxxx(文章题目)&, published iin ****杂志名, e.g.,J.Appl.Phys. ), Vol.xx, No.** (date in the journal), **(page number)Alain Adnot(索要人).
背景情况：如果稿件发出已经两个月还没有消息，而且不能通过网上查询稿件状态，那么我们完全可以写信给主编或副主编问询稿件审稿状态或结果。下面是我的一次问询信以及回复信。我的询问信Dear &&&&,I write this email to ask whether my paper has been accepted. And ifis still being reviewed, when can I get the information of the final result? How long, in ordinarycondition, can you finish reviewing a paper ?I would very much appreciate you if you could affort a little time toanswer these question. Thanks a lot!Best regards!sincerely yours&&&&&副主编回信：Dear &&&&&,Ordinarily a manuscript is reviewed within 8 weeks and returned to the author. Your manuscript,BP-3017 was received by us on January 30. It was sent to a referee on February 2. That refereewas unable to review the manuscript and informed us in mid-April. It was then sent to a secondreferee on April 22. That referee also was unable to review the paper. Itwas then sent to a third referee on May 20.Occasionally this occurs and then we must keep trying different knowledgeable referees untilsomeone responds. We always welcome your suggestions for referees in your field ofstudy. Thank you for your patience.&&&&&投稿信Dear Dr.:Enclosed please find one original and three copies of our manuscript entitled &*****&. It issubmitted to be considered for publication as an &Original Article& in your journal．This paper is～&Neither the entire paper nor any part of its content has been published or has been acceptedelsewhere．It is not being submitted to any other journal．We believe the paper may be of particular interest to the readers of your journal because the studyit reports stated the HCV infection rate among long-term transfusion patients is higher than that ofthe general population and of short-term transfusion patients．Correspondence and phone calls about the paper should be directed to *** at the followingaddress，phone and fax number，and e-mail address：Department of XXXXXXXXX,University of Science and Technology,Hefei, Anhui, 230026,P.R.ChinaTel：********Fax：********E-mail：****＠*****Thanks very much for your attention to our paper．Sincerely yours，******拒稿信背景情况：本人发现一个自认为比较有意义的实验现象，于是些了一篇Letter 投到一个期刊，但被无情的拒了，这片论文已经在另一个期刊以Article 的形式发表，下面贴出编辑给的拒稿信，希望对各位虫友能有所帮助Dear xxxxxTITLE: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxAUTHORS: xxx et alYour letter submitted to xxxxxx has now been refereed and the referee reports are attached.To be publishable in this journal, letters must be scientifically valid, contain significant newphysics, be of high quality and scientific interest, and be recognised as an important contributionto the literature.The referees find that your paper does not meet these criteria and thus does not warrantpublication in xxxxxxxxx. It has therefore been withdrawn from consideration.Yours sincerelyxxxxxxxx编辑来信Dear Mr. Jeremy STRIBLINGOn behalf of the Organizing Committee, we would like to inform you that, up to the present, wehave not received any reviews yet for you paper entitled: &Rooter: ************&. So, your paperhas been accepted, as a non-reviewed paper, for presentation at the 9th World Multiconference onSystemics, Cybernetics and Informatics (WMSCI 2005) to be held in Orlando, USA, on July10-13, 2005. We will inform you about the conference program, including your presentation, oncethe timetable is finalized.If you submitted your paper several times, and our staff did not detect the repetition of the samesubmitted paper, then your paper might have been sent several times for its review, and it hasseveral IDs. In this situation you may have received (or may receive) a regular acceptation. Insuch a case, please discard this present acceptance e-mail and be sure to always use the paper IDnumber we gave you in the e-mail where we accepted you paper as an appraised one. Otherwise,your paper will be included in the Proceedings as a non-reviewed paper.Each accepted papers (reviewed and non-reviewed) is candidate for being best paper of itsrespective session and, consequently, it is candidate for a second reviewing process to be made bythe reviewers of the Journal of Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics (JSCI), by means of whichthe best 10%-20% of the papers presented at the conference will be selected and published in theJSCI after making possible modifications (in content/format) and extensions as to adequate themto a journal publication.You can download the authors ***** (PDF format) from the conference web site(). It includes the following: the Instructions for Authors, the AuthorGuide for Preparing a Proceedings Paper, the Copyright Transfer Form, the Speaker ******Biographical Sketch and Hotel information.To submit the ele